1 3871 95 JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA - A BONA FIDE RASOPATHY SYNDROME. JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (JMML) IS A PEDIATRIC MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM OVERLAP SYNDROME WITH SUSTAINED PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS, AGGRESSIVE FEATURES, AND POOR OUTCOMES. IN >90% OF CASES JMML IS DRIVEN BY GERMLINE OR SOMATIC MUTATIONS INVOLVING THE CANONICAL RAS PATHWAY (PTPN11, NRAS, CBL, KRAS AND NF1), WITH SOMATIC MUTATIONS/ALTERATIONS IN RAS PATHWAY GENES (SECOND HIT), SETBP1, ASXL1 AND JAK3 RESULTING IN DISEASE PROGRESSION. WHILE SPONTANEOUS REGRESSION HAS BEEN SEEN IN GERMLINE PTPN11 AND CBL MUTANT JMML, IN MOST PATIENTS, ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT IS THE ONLY CURATIVE MODALITY. JMML SHARES SEVERAL PHENOTYPIC FEATURES WITH ITS ADULT COUNTERPART PROLIFERATIVE, CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (PCMML). PCMML LARGELY OCCURS DUE TO RAS PATHWAY MUTATIONS THAT OCCUR IN THE CONTEXT OF AGE RELATED CLONAL HEMATOPOIESIS (TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1), WHILE JMML IS A BONA FIDE RASOPATHY, WITH ADDITIONAL SOMATIC MUTATIONS, INCLUDING IN EPIGENETIC REGULATORS GENES RESULTING IN DISEASE PROGRESSION. 2020 2 4553 33 MUTATIONAL LANDSCAPE OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA IN CHINESE PATIENTS. BACKGROUND: CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A RARE AND HETEROGENEOUS HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCY. IT HAS BEEN SHOWN THAT THE MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES SUCH AS ASXL1, TET2, SETBP1, AND SRSF2 MUTATIONS ARE COMMON IN CAUCASIAN POPULATION. METHODS: WE RETROSPECTIVELY ANALYZED 178 CHINESE CMML PATIENTS. THE TARGETED NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING (NGS) WAS USED TO EVALUATE 114 GENE VARIATIONS, AND THE PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR OS WERE DETERMINED BY COX REGRESSION ANALYSIS. RESULTS: THE CMML PATIENTS SHOWED A UNIQUE MUTATIONAL SPECTRUM, INCLUDING TET2 (36.5%), NRAS (31.5%), ASXL1 (28.7%), SRSF2 (24.7%), AND RUNX1 (21.9%). OF THE 102 PATIENTS WITH CLONAL ANALYSIS, THE ANCESTRAL EVENTS PREFERENTIALLY OCCURRED IN TET2 (18.5%), SPLICING FACTORS (16.5%), RAS (14.0%), AND ASXL1 (7.8%), AND THE SUBCLONAL GENES WERE MAINLY ASXL1, TET2, AND RAS. IN ADDITION, THE SECONDARY ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (SAML) TRANSFORMED FROM CMML OFTEN HAD MUTATIONS IN DNMT3A, ETV6, FLT3, AND NPM1, WHILE THE PRIMARY AML (PAML) DEMONSTRATED MORE MUTATIONS IN CEBPA, DNMT3A, FLT3, IDH1/2, NPM1, AND WT1. IT WAS OF NOTE THAT A SERIES OF CLONES WERE EMERGED DURING THE PROGRESSION FROM CMML TO AML, INCLUDING DNMT3A, FLT3, AND NPM1. BY UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS, ASXL1 MUTATION, INTERMEDIATE- AND HIGH-RISK CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITY, CMML-SPECIFIC PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM (CPSS) STRATIFICATIONS (INTERMEDIATE-2 AND HIGH GROUP), AND TREATMENT OPTIONS (BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE) PREDICTED FOR WORSE OS. MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS REVEALED A SIMILAR OUTCOME. CONCLUSIONS: THE COMMON MUTATIONS IN CHINESE CMML PATIENTS INCLUDED EPIGENETIC MODIFIERS (TET2 AND ASXL1), SIGNALING TRANSDUCTION PATHWAY COMPONENTS (NRAS), AND SPLICING FACTOR (SRSF2). THE CMML PATIENTS WITH DNMT3A, ETV6, FLT3, AND NPM1 MUTATIONS TENDED TO PROGRESS TO SAML. ASXL1 MUTATION AND THERAPEUTIC MODALITIES WERE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR CMML. 2022 3 5911 20 TARGETED NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING IN MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME AND CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA AIDS DIAGNOSIS IN CHALLENGING CASES AND IDENTIFIES FREQUENT SPLICEOSOME MUTATIONS IN TRANSFORMED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA. OBJECTIVES: OPTIMAL INTEGRATION OF NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING (NGS) INTO CLINICAL PRACTICE IN HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES REMAINS UNCLEAR. WE EVALUATE THE UTILITY OF NGS IN MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. METHODS: A 42-GENE PANEL WAS USED TO SEQUENCE 109 CASES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME (MDS, N = 38), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML, N = 14), MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM (MPN, N = 24), AND MDS AND/OR MPN TRANSFORMED TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML, N = 33). RESULTS: AT LEAST ONE PATHOGENIC MUTATION WAS IDENTIFIED IN 74% OF CASES OF MDS, 100% OF CMMLS, AND 96% OF MPNS. IN CONTRAST, ONLY 47% OF CASES OF MDS (18/38) AND 7% (1/14) OF CMMLS EXHIBITED ABNORMAL CYTOGENETICS. IN DIAGNOSTICALLY DIFFICULT CASES OF MDS OR CMML WITH NORMAL CYTOGENETICS, NGS IDENTIFIED A PATHOGENIC MUTATION AND WAS CRITICAL IN ESTABLISHING THE CORRECT DIAGNOSIS. SPLICEOSOMAL GENES AND EPIGENETIC MODIFIERS WERE FREQUENTLY MUTATED. SPLICEOSOME MUTATIONS WERE ALSO FREQUENTLY DETECTED IN AML ARISING FROM MDS, CMML, OR MPN (39%) COMPARED WITH THE REPORTED RATE IN DE NOVO AML (7%-14%). CONCLUSIONS: IN DIFFICULT CASES OF MDS OR MPN, NGS FACILITATES DIAGNOSIS BY DETECTION OF GENE MUTATIONS TO CONFIRM CLONALITY, AND AMLS EVOLVING FROM MDS OR MPN CARRY FREQUENT MUTATIONS IN SPLICEOSOMAL GENES. 2016 4 961 37 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: A GENETIC AND CLINICAL UPDATE. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL STEM CELL DISORDER, CHARACTERIZED BY PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS AND OVERLAPPING FEATURES BETWEEN MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS) AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPNS). CLONAL CYTOGENETIC CHANGES ARE SEEN IN UP TO 30 % PATIENTS, WHILE APPROXIMATELY 90 % HAVE DETECTABLE MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES. MOST PATIENTS ARE DIAGNOSED IN THE SEVENTH DECADE OF LIFE. GENE MUTATIONS IN TEN-ELEVEN TRANSLOCATION (TET) ONCOGENE FAMILY MEMBER 2 (TET2) (60 %), SRSF2 (50 %), ASXL1 (40 %), AND RAS (20-30 %) ARE FREQUENT, WITH ONLY FRAME SHIFT AND NONSENSE ASXL1 MUTATIONS NEGATIVELY IMPACTING OVERALL SURVIVAL. WITH THE LACK OF FORMAL GUIDELINES, MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE CRITERIA ARE OFTEN EXTRAPOLATED FROM MDS AND MPN. CONTEMPORARY MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED CMML-SPECIFIC PROGNOSTIC MODELS INCLUDE THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES (GFM) MODEL AND THE MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL, BOTH INCORPORATING ASXL1 MUTATIONAL STATUS. HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS AND ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT REMAIN THE TWO MOST COMMONLY USED TREATMENT STRATEGIES, WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESULTS. CLINICAL TRIALS EXPLOITING EPIGENETIC AND SIGNAL PATHWAY ABNORMALITIES, FREQUENT IN CMML, OFFER HOPE AND PROMISE. 2015 5 4562 51 MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM OVERLAP SYNDROMES: A FOCUSED REVIEW. MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME (MDS)/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM (MPN) OVERLAP SYNDROMES ARE UNIQUE MYELOID NEOPLASMS, WITH OVERLAPPING FEATURES OF MDS AND MPN. THEY CONSIST OF FOUR ADULT ONSET ENTITIES INCLUDING CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), MDS/MPN-RING SIDEROBLASTS-THROMBOCYTOSIS (MDS/MPN-RS-T), BCR-ABL1 NEGATIVE ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA (ACML) AND MDS/MPN-UNCLASSIFIABLE (MDS/MPN-U); WITH JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (JMML) BEING THE ONLY PEDIATRIC ONSET ENTITY. AMONG THESE OVERLAP NEOPLASMS, CMML IS THE MOST FREQUENT AND IS HALLMARKED BY THE PRESENCE OF SUSTAINED PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS WITH RECURRENT MUTATIONS INVOLVING TET2 (60%), SRSF2 (50%) AND ASXL1 (40%); WITH RAS PATHWAY MUTATIONS AND JAK2V617F BEING RELATIVELY ENRICHED IN PROLIFERATIVE CMML SUBTYPES (WBC >/=13 X 109/L). CMML USUALLY PRESENTS IN THE 7TH DECADE OF LIFE, WITH A MALE PREPONDERANCE AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH A MEDIAN OVERALL SURVIVAL OF <36 MONTHS. ADVERSE PROGNOSTICATORS IN CMML INCLUDE INCREASING AGE, HIGH WBC, PRESENCE OF CIRCULATING IMMATURE MYELOID CELLS, ANEMIA, THROMBOCYTOPENIA AND TRUNCATING ASXL1 MUTATIONS. WHILE ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION REMAINS THE ONLY CURATIVE OPTION, GIVEN THE LATE ONSET OF THIS NEOPLASM AND HIGH FREQUENCY OF COMORBIDITIES, MOST PATIENTS REMAIN INELIGIBLE. HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS SUCH AS AZACITIDINE, DECITABINE AND ORAL DECITABINE/CEDAZURIDINE HAVE BEEN US FDA APPROVED FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CMML, WITH OVERALL RESPONSE RATES OF 40-50% AND COMPLETE REMISSION RATES OF <20%. WHILE THESE AGENTS EPIGENETICALLY RESTORE HEMATOPOIESIS IN A SUBSET OF RESPONDING PATIENTS, THEY DO NOT IMPACT MUTATIONAL ALLELE BURDENS AND EVENTUAL DISEASE PROGRESSION TO AML REMAINS INEVITABLE. NEWER TREATMENT MODALITIES EXPLOITING EPIGENETIC, SIGNALING AND SPLICING ABNORMALITIES COMMONLY SEEN IN CMML ARE MUCH NEEDED. 2020 6 5980 25 TET2 MUTATIONS WERE PREDICTIVE OF INFERIOR PROGNOSIS IN THE PRESENCE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. BACKGROUND: SOMATIC MUTATIONS INVOLVING EPIGENETIC REGULATORS, HISTONE MODIFICATION AND CHROMATIN REGULATION, SPLICING COMPONENTS, TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND SIGNALING REGULATOR GENES ARE COMMON IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) PATIENTS. IT HAS BEEN CONSENSUS THAT ASXL1 MUTATIONS HAVE ADVERSELY IMPACT ON OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS), WHILE THE EFFECT OF TET2 MUTATIONS REMAINS CONTROVERSIAL AND UNDEFINED. METHODS: ASXL1 AND TET2 MUTATIONS WERE ANALYZED IN 141 PATIENTS WITH CMML USING SANGER SEQUENCING, WITH THE AIM TO IDENTIFY THE INTERPLAY OF ASXL1 AND TET2 MUTATIONS IN THE PROGNOSIS OF CMML. RESULTS: SIXTY-FIVE (46.1%) OF THE CMML PATIENTS HARBORED ASXL1 MUTATIONS (FRAMESHIFT AND NONSENSE), AND 46 (32.6%) HAD TET2 MUTATIONS (FRAME SHIFT, NONSENSE AND MISSENSE). IN A SEPARATE MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS THAT INCLUDED THE MAYO PROGNOSTIC MODEL AS A SINGLE VARIABLE ALONG WITH ASXL1WT/TET2WT, THE RESPECTIVE HAZARD RATIOS OF ASXL1MUT/TET2MUT, ASXL1MUT/TET2WT AND ASXL1WT/TET2MUT WERE 4.7 (95% CI, 2.2-10.3; P<0.001), 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1-4.2; P=0.025) AND 1.3 (95% CI, 0.6-2.5; P=0.521). CONCLUSIONS: OUR STUDY SHOWED THAT ASXL1 MUTATIONS PREDICT INFERIOR OS, AND ADDITIONAL TET2 MUTATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH POOR SURVIVAL IN THE PRESENCE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS OF CMML PATIENTS. 2016 7 4748 31 NOVEL MUTATIONS AND THEIR FUNCTIONAL AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE IN MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS: JAK2, MPL, TET2, ASXL1, CBL, IDH AND IKZF1. MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPNS) ORIGINATE FROM GENETICALLY TRANSFORMED HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS THAT RETAIN THE CAPACITY FOR MULTILINEAGE DIFFERENTIATION AND EFFECTIVE MYELOPOIESIS. BEGINNING IN EARLY 2005, A NUMBER OF NOVEL MUTATIONS INVOLVING JANUS KINASE 2 (JAK2), MYELOPROLIFERATIVE LEUKEMIA VIRUS (MPL), TET ONCOGENE FAMILY MEMBER 2 (TET2), ADDITIONAL SEX COMBS-LIKE 1 (ASXL1), CASITAS B-LINEAGE LYMPHOMA PROTO-ONCOGENE (CBL), ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE (IDH) AND IKAROS FAMILY ZINC FINGER 1 (IKZF1) HAVE BEEN DESCRIBED IN BCR-ABL1-NEGATIVE MPNS. HOWEVER, NONE OF THESE MUTATIONS WERE MPN SPECIFIC, DISPLAYED MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY OR COULD BE TRACED BACK TO A COMMON ANCESTRAL CLONE. JAK2 AND MPL MUTATIONS APPEAR TO EXERT A PHENOTYPE-MODIFYING EFFECT AND ARE DISTINCTLY ASSOCIATED WITH POLYCYTHEMIA VERA, ESSENTIAL THROMBOCYTHEMIA AND PRIMARY MYELOFIBROSIS; THE CORRESPONDING MUTATIONAL FREQUENCIES ARE APPROXIMATELY 99, 55 AND 65% FOR JAK2 AND 0, 3 AND 10% FOR MPL MUTATIONS. THE INCIDENCE OF TET2, ASXL1, CBL, IDH OR IKZF1 MUTATIONS IN THESE DISORDERS RANGES FROM 0 TO 17%; THESE LATTER MUTATIONS ARE MORE COMMON IN CHRONIC (TET2, ASXL1, CBL) OR JUVENILE (CBL) MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS, MASTOCYTOSIS (TET2), MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (TET2, ASXL1) AND SECONDARY ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA, INCLUDING BLAST-PHASE MPN (IDH, ASXL1, IKZF1). THE FUNCTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF MPN-ASSOCIATED MUTATIONS INCLUDE UNREGULATED JAK-STAT (JANUS KINASE/SIGNAL TRANSDUCER AND ACTIVATOR OF TRANSCRIPTION) SIGNALING, EPIGENETIC MODULATION OF TRANSCRIPTION AND ABNORMAL ACCUMULATION OF ONCOPROTEINS. HOWEVER, IT IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHETHER AND HOW THESE ABNORMALITIES CONTRIBUTE TO DISEASE INITIATION, CLONAL EVOLUTION OR BLASTIC TRANSFORMATION. 2010 8 1266 36 CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL STEM CELL DISORDER ASSOCIATED WITH PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS AND AN INHERENT TENDENCY TO TRANSFORM TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA. CMML HAS OVERLAPPING FEATURES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS. CLONAL CYTOGENETIC CHANGES ARE SEEN IN ~30%, WHEREAS GENE MUTATIONS ARE SEEN IN >90% OF PATIENTS. COMMON CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES INCLUDE; TRISOMY 8, -Y, -7/DEL(7Q), TRISOMY 21 AND DEL(20Q), WITH THE MAYO-FRENCH RISK STRATIFICATION EFFECTIVELY RISK STRATIFYING PATIENTS BASED ON CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES. GENE MUTATIONS FREQUENTLY INVOLVE EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (TET2 ~60%), MODULATORS OF CHROMATIN (ASXL1 ~40%), SPLICEOSOME COMPONENTS (SRSF2 ~50%), TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS (RUNX1 ~15%) AND SIGNAL PATHWAYS (RAS ~30%, CBL ~15%). OF THESE, THUS FAR, ONLY NONSENSE AND FRAMESHIFT ASXL1 MUTATIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO NEGATIVELY IMPACT OVERALL SURVIVAL. THIS HAS RESULTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY, MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED (INCLUSIVE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS) CMML PROGNOSTIC MODELS, INCLUDING MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL AND THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES MODEL. BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE PREVALENT GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC DYSREGULATION HAS RESULTED IN EMERGING TARGETED TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR SOME PATIENTS. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED (CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR) PROGNOSTIC MODEL ALONG WITH CMML-SPECIFIC RESPONSE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ARE MUCH NEEDED FUTURE GOALS. 2016 9 4557 22 MUTATIONS IN ASXL1 ARE ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS ACROSS THE SPECTRUM OF MALIGNANT MYELOID DISEASES. THE ASXL1 GENE IS ONE OF THE MOST FREQUENTLY MUTATED GENES IN MALIGNANT MYELOID DISEASES. THE ASXL1 PROTEIN BELONGS TO PROTEIN COMPLEXES INVOLVED IN THE EPIGENETIC REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION. ASXL1 MUTATIONS ARE FOUND IN MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPN), MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) AND ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML). THEY ARE GENERALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SIGNS OF AGGRESSIVENESS AND POOR CLINICAL OUTCOME. BECAUSE OF THIS, A SYSTEMATIC DETERMINATION OF ASXL1 MUTATIONAL STATUS IN MYELOID MALIGNANCIES SHOULD HELP IN PROGNOSIS ASSESSMENT. 2012 10 5244 23 PROGNOSTIC INTERACTION BETWEEN ASXL1 AND TET2 MUTATIONS IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. MUTATIONS INVOLVING EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (TET2~60% AND ASXL1~40%) AND SPLICING COMPONENTS (SRSF2~50%) ARE FREQUENT IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML). ON A 27-GENE TARGETED CAPTURE PANEL PERFORMED ON 175 CMML PATIENTS (66% MALES, MEDIAN AGE 70 YEARS), COMMON MUTATIONS INCLUDED: TET2 46%, ASXL1 47%, SRSF2 45% AND SETBP1 19%. A TOTAL OF 172 (98%) PATIENTS HAD AT LEAST ONE MUTATION, 21 (12%) HAD 2, 24 (14%) HAD 3 AND 30 (17%) HAD >3 MUTATIONS. IN A UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS, THE PRESENCE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS (P=0.02) AND THE ABSENCE OF TET2 MUTATIONS (P=0.03), ADVERSELY IMPACTED SURVIVAL; WHILE THE NUMBER OF CONCURRENT MUTATIONS HAD NO IMPACT (P=0.3). IN A MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS THAT INCLUDED HEMOGLOBIN, PLATELET COUNT, ABSOLUTE MONOCYTE COUNT AND CIRCULATING IMMATURE MYELOID CELLS (MAYO MODEL), THE PRESENCE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS (P=0.01) AND ABSENCE OF TET2 MUTATIONS (P=0.003) RETAINED PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE. PATIENTS WERE STRATIFIED INTO FOUR CATEGORIES: ASXL1WT/TET2WT (N=56), ASXL1MUT/TET2WT (N=31), ASXL1MUT/TET2MUT (N=50) AND ASXL1WT/TET2MUT (N=38). SURVIVAL DATA DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN FAVOR OF ASXL1WT/TET2MUT (38 MONTHS; P=0.016), COMPARED WITH THOSE WITH ASXL1WT/TET2WT (19 MONTHS), ASXL1MUT/TET2WT (21 MONTHS) AND ASXL1MUT/TET2MUT (16 MONTHS) (P=0.3). WE CONFIRM THE NEGATIVE PROGNOSTIC IMPACT IMPARTED BY ASXL1 MUTATIONS AND SUGGEST A FAVORABLE IMPACT FROM TET2 MUTATIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS. 2016 11 6780 28 [BLASTIC PLASMACYTOID DENDRITIC CELL NEOPLASM ACCOMPANIED BY CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH AZACITIDINE]. BLASTIC PLASMACYTOID DENDRITIC CELL NEOPLASM (BPDCN) IS A RARE DISEASE THAT DEVELOPS WITH A SKIN LESION AND IS OFTEN ACCOMPANIED BY LEUKEMIC TRANSFORMATION. THE NORMAL COUNTERPARTS OF BPDCN TUMOR CELLS ARE PROGENITORS OF PLASMACYTOID DENDRITIC CELLS, WHEREAS THE ORIGINS ARE THOUGHT TO BE HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS. APPROXIMATELY 10%-20% OF BPDCN PATIENTS DEVELOP OTHER HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES, INCLUDING CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML). MUTATIONS IN EPIGENETIC REGULATORS ARE FREQUENTLY OBSERVED IN BOTH BPDCN AND CMML TUMORS. AZACITIDINE, A DRUG THAT TARGETS EPIGENETIC DYSREGULATION, IS KNOWN TO BE AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR CMML. HOWEVER, IT HAS BEEN USED IN FEW BPDCN PATIENTS. HERE, WE REPORT A BPDCN PATIENT WITH SKIN LESIONS, BONE MARROW INFILTRATION, AND LYMPHADENOPATHY. CMML ALSO DEVELOPED DURING THE COURSE OF BPDCN. AZACITIDINE HAD POSITIVE EFFECTS ON CMML; HOWEVER, BPDCN AGGRESSIVELY RELAPSED DURING TREATMENT. TWO TET2 MUTATIONS WERE FOUND IN BOTH BPDCN AND CMML TUMORS; ONE OF WHICH WAS COMMONLY IDENTIFIED IN BOTH TUMORS. 2018 12 5246 31 PROGNOSTIC SCORE INCLUDING GENE MUTATIONS IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. PURPOSE: SEVERAL PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN PROPOSED FOR CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), A DISEASE IN WHICH SOME GENE MUTATIONS-INCLUDING ASXL1-HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS IN UNIVARIABLE ANALYSES. WE DEVELOPED AND VALIDATED A PROGNOSTIC SCORE FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS) BASED ON MUTATIONAL STATUS AND STANDARD CLINICAL VARIABLES. PATIENTS AND METHODS: WE GENOTYPED ASXL1 AND UP TO 18 OTHER GENES INCLUDING EPIGENETIC (TET2, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, DNMT3A), SPLICING (SF3B1, SRSF2, ZRSF2, U2AF1), TRANSCRIPTION (RUNX1, NPM1, TP53), AND SIGNALING (NRAS, KRAS, CBL, JAK2, FLT3) REGULATORS IN 312 PATIENTS WITH CMML. GENOTYPES AND CLINICAL VARIABLES WERE INCLUDED IN A MULTIVARIABLE COX MODEL OF OS VALIDATED BY BOOTSTRAPPING. A SCORING SYSTEM WAS DEVELOPED USING REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS FROM THIS MODEL. RESULTS: ASXL1 MUTATIONS (P < .0001) AND, TO A LESSER EXTENT, SRSF2 (P = .03), CBL (P = .003), AND IDH2 (P = .03) MUTATIONS PREDICTED INFERIOR OS IN UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS. THE RETAINED INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS INCLUDED ASXL1 MUTATIONS, AGE OLDER THAN 65 YEARS, WBC COUNT GREATER THAN 15 X10(9)/L, PLATELET COUNT LESS THAN 100 X10(9)/L, AND ANEMIA (HEMOGLOBIN < 10 G/DL IN FEMALE PATIENTS, < 11G/DL IN MALE PATIENTS). THE RESULTING FIVE-PARAMETER PROGNOSTIC SCORE DELINEATED THREE GROUPS OF PATIENTS WITH MEDIAN OS NOT REACHED, 38.5 MONTHS, AND 14.4 MONTHS, RESPECTIVELY (P < .0001), AND WAS VALIDATED IN AN INDEPENDENT COHORT OF 165 PATIENTS (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: A NEW PROGNOSTIC SCORE INCLUDING ASXL1 STATUS, AGE, HEMOGLOBIN, WBC, AND PLATELET COUNTS DEFINES THREE GROUPS OF CMML PATIENTS WITH DISTINCT OUTCOMES. BASED ON CONCORDANCE ANALYSIS, THIS SCORE APPEARS MORE DISCRIMINATIVE THAN THOSE BASED SOLELY ON CLINICAL PARAMETERS. 2013 13 962 43 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: FOCUS ON CLINICAL PRACTICE. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL STEM CELL DISORDER WITH FEATURES THAT OVERLAP THOSE OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDSS) AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPNS). CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA OFTEN RESULTS IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS AND HAS AN INHERENT TENDENCY TO TRANSFORM TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA. CLONAL CYTOGENETIC CHANGES ARE SEEN IN APPROXIMATELY 30% OF PATIENTS, AND MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES ARE SEEN IN MORE THAN 90%. GENE MUTATIONS INVOLVING TET2 ( APPROXIMATELY 60%), SRSF2 ( APPROXIMATELY 50%), ASXL1 ( APPROXIMATELY 40%), AND RAS ( APPROXIMATELY 30%) ARE FREQUENT, WITH NONSENSE AND FRAMESHIFT ASXL1 MUTATIONS BEING THE ONLY MUTATIONS IDENTIFIED THUS FAR TO HAVE AN INDEPENDENT NEGATIVE PROGNOSTIC EFFECT ON OVERALL SURVIVAL. CONTEMPORARY MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED PROGNOSTIC MODELS (INCLUSIVE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS) INCLUDE THE MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL AND THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES MODEL. GIVEN THE LACK OF FORMAL TREATMENT AND RESPONSE CRITERIA, MANAGEMENT OF CMML IS OFTEN EXTRAPOLATED FROM MDS AND MPN, WITH ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT BEING THE ONLY CURATIVE OPTION. HYDROXYUREA AND OTHER CYTOREDUCTIVE AGENTS HAVE BEEN USED TO CONTROL MPN-LIKE FEATURES, WHILE EPIGENETIC MODIFIERS SUCH AS HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS HAVE BEEN USED FOR MDS-LIKE FEATURES. GIVEN THE RELATIVELY POOR RESPONSE TO THESE AGENTS AND THE INHERENT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT, NEWER DRUGS EXPLOITING MOLECULAR AND EPIGENETIC ABNORMALITIES IN CMML ARE BEING DEVELOPED. THE CREATION OF CMML-SPECIFIC RESPONSE CRITERIA IS A MUCH NEEDED STEP IN ORDER TO IMPROVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES. 2016 14 1311 40 DEFINITIONS, BIOLOGY, AND CURRENT THERAPEUTIC LANDSCAPE OF MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS. MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MDS/MPN) ARE HEMATOLOGICAL DISORDERS CHARACTERIZED BY BOTH PROLIFERATIVE AND DYSPLASTIC FEATURES. ACCORDING TO THE 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS CLASSIFICATION (ICC), MDS/MPN CONSISTS OF CLONAL MONOCYTOSIS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE (CMUS), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA (ACML), MDS/MPN WITH SF3B1 MUTATION (MDS/MPN-T-SF3B1), MDS/MPN WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS AND THROMBOCYTOSIS NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (MDS/MPN-RS-T-NOS), AND MDS/MPN-NOS. THESE DISORDERS EXHIBIT A DIVERSE RANGE OF GENETIC ALTERATIONS INVOLVING VARIOUS TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS (E.G., RUNX1), SIGNALING MOLECULES (E.G., NRAS, JAK2), SPLICING FACTORS (E.G., SF3B, SRSF2), AND EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (E.G., TET2, ASXL1, DNMT3A), AS WELL AS SPECIFIC CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES (E.G., 8 TRISOMIES, 7 DELETIONS/MONOSOMIES). CLINICAL STUDIES EXPLORING THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS FOR HIGHER-RISK MDS/MPN OVERLAP SYNDROMES MOSTLY INVOLVE HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS, BUT OTHER TREATMENTS SUCH AS LENALIDOMIDE AND TARGETED AGENTS SUCH AS JAK INHIBITORS AND INHIBITORS TARGETING PARP, HISTONE DEACETYLASES, AND THE RAS PATHWAY ARE UNDER INVESTIGATION. WHILE THESE TREATMENT MODALITIES CAN PROVIDE PARTIAL DISEASE CONTROL, ALLOGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION (ALLO-BMT) IS THE ONLY POTENTIALLY CURATIVE OPTION FOR PATIENTS. IMPORTANT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS CORRELATING WITH OUTCOMES AFTER ALLO-BMT INCLUDE COMORBIDITIES, SPLENOMEGALY, KARYOTYPE ALTERATIONS, AND THE BONE MARROW BLASTS PERCENTAGE AT THE TIME OF TRANSPLANTATION. FUTURE RESEARCH IS IMPERATIVE TO OPTIMIZING THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES AND ENHANCING PATIENT OUTCOMES IN MDS/MPN NEOPLASMS. IN THIS REVIEW, WE SUMMARIZE MDS/MPN DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA, BIOLOGY, AND CURRENT AND FUTURE TREATMENT OPTIONS, INCLUDING BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION. 2023 15 2277 27 EPIGENETIC REGULATION BY ASXL1 IN MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. MYELOID MALIGNANCIES ARE CLONAL HEMATOPOIETIC DISORDERS THAT ARE COMPRISED OF A SPECTRUM OF GENETICALLY HETEROGENEOUS DISORDERS, INCLUDING MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS), MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPN), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), AND ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML). MYELOID MALIGNANCIES ARE CHARACTERIZED BY EXCESSIVE PROLIFERATION, ABNORMAL SELF-RENEWAL, AND/OR DIFFERENTIATION DEFECTS OF HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS (HSCS) AND MYELOID PROGENITOR CELLS HEMATOPOIETIC STEM/PROGENITOR CELLS (HSPCS). MYELOID MALIGNANCIES CAN BE CAUSED BY GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS THAT PROVOKE KEY CELLULAR FUNCTIONS, SUCH AS SELF-RENEWAL, PROLIFERATION, BIASED LINEAGE COMMITMENT, AND DIFFERENTIATION. ADVANCES IN NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING LED TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE MUTATIONS IN MYELOID NEOPLASMS, AND MANY NEW GENE MUTATIONS WERE IDENTIFIED AS KEY FACTORS IN DRIVING THE PATHOGENESIS OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. THE POLYCOMB PROTEIN ASXL1 WAS IDENTIFIED TO BE FREQUENTLY MUTATED IN ALL FORMS OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES, WITH MUTATIONAL FREQUENCIES OF 20%, 43%, 10%, AND 20% IN MDS, CMML, MPN, AND AML, RESPECTIVELY. SIGNIFICANTLY, ASXL1 MUTATIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH A POOR PROGNOSIS IN ALL FORMS OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. THE FACT THAT ASXL1 MUTATIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CMML, MDS, AND AML, POINTS TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT ASXL1 MUTATION IS A KEY FACTOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. THIS REVIEW SUMMARIZES THE RECENT ADVANCES IN UNDERSTANDING MYELOID MALIGNANCIES WITH A SPECIFIC FOCUS ON ASXL1 MUTATIONS. 2023 16 569 27 BCOR AND BCORL1 MUTATIONS IN MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES AND RELATED DISORDERS. PATIENTS WITH LOW-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS) THAT RAPIDLY PROGRESS TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML) REMAIN A CHALLENGE IN DISEASE MANAGEMENT. USING WHOLE-EXOME SEQUENCING OF AN MDS PATIENT, WE IDENTIFIED A SOMATIC MUTATION IN THE BCOR GENE ALSO MUTATED IN AML. SEQUENCING OF BCOR AND RELATED BCORL1 GENES IN A COHORT OF 354 MDS PATIENTS IDENTIFIED 4.2% AND 0.8% OF MUTATIONS RESPECTIVELY. BCOR MUTATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH RUNX1 (P = .002) AND DNMT3A MUTATIONS (P = .015). BCOR IS ALSO MUTATED IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA PATIENTS (7.4%) AND BCORL1 IN AML PATIENTS WITH MYELODYSPLASIA-RELATED CHANGES (9.1%). USING DEEP SEQUENCING, WE SHOW THAT BCOR MUTATIONS ARISE AFTER MUTATIONS AFFECTING GENES INVOLVED IN SPLICING MACHINERY OR EPIGENETIC REGULATION. IN UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS, BCOR MUTATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS IN MDS (OVERALL SURVIVAL [OS]: P = .013; CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF AML TRANSFORMATION: P = .005). MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS INCLUDING AGE, INTERNATIONAL PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM, TRANSFUSION DEPENDENCY, AND MUTATIONAL STATUS CONFIRMED A SIGNIFICANT INFERIOR OS TO PATIENTS WITH A BCOR MUTATION (HAZARD RATIO, 3.3; 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL, 1.4-8.1; P = .008). THESE DATA SUGGEST THAT BCOR MUTATIONS DEFINE THE CLINICAL COURSE RATHER THAN DISEASE INITIATION. DESPITE INFREQUENT MUTATIONS, BCOR ANALYSES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN RISK STRATIFICATION. 2013 17 960 39 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: 2016 UPDATE ON DIAGNOSIS, RISK STRATIFICATION, AND MANAGEMENT. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL DISORDER CHARACTERIZED BY OVERLAPPING FEATURES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS. DIAGNOSIS IS BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF PERSISTENT (>3 MONTHS) PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS (>1 X 10(9) /L), ALONG WITH BONE MARROW DYSPLASIA. CLONAL CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES OCCUR IN APPROXIMATELY 20-30% OF PATIENTS, WHILE >90% HAVE GENE MUTATIONS. MUTATIONS INVOLVING TET2 ( APPROXIMATELY 60%), SRSF2 ( APPROXIMATELY 50%), ASXL1 ( APPROXIMATELY 40%), AND RAS ( APPROXIMATELY 30%) ARE FREQUENT; WITH ONLY ASXL1 MUTATIONS NEGATIVELY IMPACTING OVERALL SURVIVAL. TWO MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED, CMML-SPECIFIC PROGNOSTIC MODELS INCLUDE; THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES (GFM) AND THE MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL (MMM). THE GFM MODEL SEGREGATES PATIENTS INTO 3 GROUPS BASED ON: AGE >65 YEARS, WBC >15 X 10(9) /L, ANEMIA, PLATELETS <100 X 10(9) /L, AND ASXL1 MUTATION STATUS, WITH RESPECTIVE MEDIAN SURVIVALS OF 56 (LOW), 27.4 (INTERMEDIATE), AND 9.2 (HIGH) MONTHS. THE MMM IS BASED ON ASXL1 MUTATIONAL STATUS, ABSOLUTE MONOCYTE COUNT >10 X 10(9) /L, HEMOGLOBIN <10 G/DL, PLATELETS <100 X 109/L AND CIRCULATING IMMATURE MYELOID CELLS. THIS MODEL STRATIFIES PATIENTS INTO FOUR GROUPS; HIGH (>/=3 RISK FACTORS), INTERMEDIATE-2 (2 RISK FACTORS), INTERMEDIATE-1 (1 RISK FACTOR) AND LOW (NO RISK FACTORS), WITH MEDIAN SURVIVALS OF 16, 31, 59, AND 97 MONTHS, RESPECTIVELY. HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS SUCH AS 5-AZACITIDINE AND DECITABINE ARE COMMONLY USED, WITH OVERALL RESPONSE RATES OF APPROXIMATELY 30-40% AND COMPLETE REMISSION RATES OF APPROXIMATELY 7-17%. ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT IS THE ONLY POTENTIALLY CURATIVE OPTION, BUT IS ASSOCIATED WITH SIGNIFICANT MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY. INDIVIDUALIZED THERAPY, INCLUDING EPIGENETIC MODIFIERS AND SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITORS, ARE EXCITING PROSPECTS. AM. J. HEMATOL. 91:632-642, 2016. (C) 2016 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC. 2016 18 4485 30 MOLECULAR SIMILARITY BETWEEN MYELODYSPLASTIC FORM OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA AND REFRACTORY ANEMIA WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA IS SIMILAR TO BUT A SEPARATE ENTITY FROM BOTH MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS AND MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES, AND SHOWS EITHER MYELOPROLIFERATIVE OR MYELODYSPLASTIC FEATURES. WE ASK WHETHER THIS DISTINCTION MAY HAVE A MOLECULAR BASIS. WE ESTABLISHED THE GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES OF 39 SAMPLES OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (INCLUDING 12 CD34-POSITIVE) AND 32 CD34-POSITIVE SAMPLES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES BY USING AFFYMETRIX MICROARRAYS, AND STUDIED THE STATUS OF 18 GENES BY SANGER SEQUENCING AND ARRAY-COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION IN 53 SAMPLES. ANALYSIS OF 12 MRNAS FROM CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA ESTABLISHED A GENE EXPRESSION SIGNATURE OF 122 PROBE SETS DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED BETWEEN PROLIFERATIVE AND DYSPLASTIC CASES OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. AS COMPARED TO PROLIFERATIVE CASES, DYSPLASTIC CASES OVER-EXPRESSED GENES INVOLVED IN RED BLOOD CELL BIOLOGY. WHEN APPLIED TO 32 MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES, THIS GENE EXPRESSION SIGNATURE WAS ABLE TO DISCRIMINATE REFRACTORY ANEMIAS WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS FROM REFRACTORY ANEMIAS WITH EXCESS OF BLASTS. BY COMPARING MRNAS FROM THESE TWO FORMS OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES WE DERIVED A SECOND GENE EXPRESSION SIGNATURE. THIS SIGNATURE SEPARATED THE MYELODYSPLASTIC AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE FORMS OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS. THESE RESULTS WERE VALIDATED USING TWO INDEPENDENT GENE EXPRESSION DATA SETS. WE FOUND THAT MYELODYSPLASTIC CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS ARE CHARACTERIZED BY MUTATIONS IN TRANSCRIPTION/EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (ASXL1, RUNX1, TET2) AND SPLICING GENES (SRSF2) AND THE ABSENCE OF MUTATIONS IN SIGNALING GENES. MYELODYSPLASTIC CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS AND REFRACTORY ANEMIAS WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS SHARE A COMMON EXPRESSION PROGRAM SUGGESTING THEY ARE PART OF A CONTINUUM, WHICH IS NOT TOTALLY EXPLAINED BY THEIR SIMILAR BUT NOT, HOWEVER, IDENTICAL MUTATION SPECTRUM. 2013 19 4571 22 MYELOMONOCYTIC SKEWING IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: PHENOTYPIC, MOLECULAR AND BIOLOGIC FEATURES AND IMPACT ON SURVIVAL. BACKGROUND: MYELOMONOCYTIC SKEWING IS CONSIDERED AS A KEY PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC PHENOMENON IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), BUT ITS PREVALENCE AND POTENTIAL CORRELATION WITH PHENOTYPIC, GENOTYPIC, AND CLINICAL FEATURES ARE POORLY DEFINED. METHODS: SKEWED DIFFERENTIATION TOWARD THE MYELOMONOCYTIC OVER ERYTHROID COMMITMENT AS INDICATED BY AN INVERSE RATIO OF MYELOMONOCYTIC/ERYTHROID COLONIES WAS INVESTIGATED IN 146 PATIENTS WITH CMML BY SEMISOLID IN VITRO CULTURES. RESULTS: THERE WAS A HIGH PREVALENCE OF MYELOMONOCYTIC SKEWING IN PATIENTS WITH CMML (120/146, 82%); WHEREAS, THIS PHENOMENON WAS RARE IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS (1/98, 1%). PATIENTS WITH CMML WITH MYELOMONOCYTIC SKEWING HAD HIGHER WHITE BLOOD CELL AND PERIPHERAL BLAST CELL COUNTS, AND LOWER PLATELET VALUES. THE NUMBER OF MUTATIONS IN GENES OF THE EPIGENETIC AND/OR SPLICING CATEGORY WAS HIGHER IN CMML PATIENTS WITH AS COMPARED WITH PATIENTS WITHOUT SKEWING. PATIENTS WITH MYELOMONOCYTIC SKEWING HAD MORE FREQUENTLY MUTATIONS IN RASOPATHY GENES AND HIGHER GROWTH FACTOR INDEPENDENT MYELOID COLONY FORMATION. INTERESTINGLY, THE LACK OF MYELOMONOCYTIC SKEWING DISCRIMINATED PATIENTS WITH CMML WITH A PARTICULARLY FAVORABLE PROGNOSIS (60 VS 19 MONTHS, P = .003) AND A MINIMAL RISK OF TRANSFORMATION. CONCLUSION: MYELOMONOCYTIC SKEWING AS DETERMINED BY SEMISOLID CULTURES CAN DISCRIMINATE SUBGROUPS OF PATIENTS WITH CMML WITH A DIFFERENT PHENOTYPE, A DIFFERENT GENOTYPE, AND A DIFFERENT PROGNOSIS. 2021 20 1070 23 CLONAL ARCHITECTURE OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS. GENOMIC STUDIES IN CHRONIC MYELOID MALIGNANCIES, INCLUDING MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPN), MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS), AND MPN/MDS, HAVE IDENTIFIED COMMON MUTATIONS IN GENES ENCODING SIGNALING, EPIGENETIC, TRANSCRIPTION, AND SPLICING FACTORS. IN THE PRESENT STUDY, WE INTERROGATED THE CLONAL ARCHITECTURE BY MUTATION-SPECIFIC DISCRIMINATION ANALYSIS OF SINGLE-CELL-DERIVED COLONIES IN 28 PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS (CMML), THE MOST FREQUENT MPN/MDS. THIS ANALYSIS REVEALS A LINEAR ACQUISITION OF THE STUDIED MUTATIONS WITH LIMITED BRANCHING THROUGH LOSS OF HETEROZYGOSITY. SERIAL ANALYSIS OF UNTREATED AND TREATED SAMPLES DEMONSTRATES A DYNAMIC ARCHITECTURE ON WHICH MOST CURRENT THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES HAVE LIMITED EFFECTS. THE MAIN DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS ARE EARLY CLONAL DOMINANCE, ARISING AT THE CD34(+)/CD38(-) STAGE OF HEMATOPOIESIS, AND GRANULOMONOCYTIC DIFFERENTIATION SKEWING OF MULTIPOTENT AND COMMON MYELOID PROGENITORS. COMPARISON OF CLONAL EXPANSIONS OF TET2 MUTATIONS IN MDS, MPN, AND CMML, TOGETHER WITH FUNCTIONAL INVALIDATION OF TET2 IN SORTED PROGENITORS, SUGGESTS A CAUSATIVE LINK BETWEEN EARLY CLONAL DOMINANCE AND SKEWED GRANULOMONOCYTIC DIFFERENTIATION. ALTOGETHER, EARLY CLONAL DOMINANCE MAY DISTINGUISH CMML FROM OTHER CHRONIC MYELOID NEOPLASMS WITH SIMILAR GENE MUTATIONS. 2013