1 6007 145 THE ANATOMY OF PAIN AND SUFFERING IN THE BRAIN AND ITS CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS. PAIN IS AN UNPLEASANT SENSORY AND EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCE ASSOCIATED WITH ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL TISSUE DAMAGE. CHRONIC PAIN, WITH A PREVALENCE OF 20-30 % IS THE MAJOR CAUSE OF HUMAN SUFFERING WORLDWIDE, BECAUSE EFFECTIVE, SPECIFIC AND SAFE THERAPIES HAVE YET TO BE DEVELOPED. IT IS UNEVENLY DISTRIBUTED AMONG SEXES, WITH WOMEN EXPERIENCING MORE PAIN AND SUFFERING. CHRONIC PAIN CAN BE ANATOMICALLY AND PHENOMENOLOGICALLY DISSECTED INTO THREE SEPARABLE BUT INTERACTING PATHWAYS, A LATERAL 'PAINFULNESS' PATHWAY, A MEDIAL 'SUFFERING' PATHWAY AND A DESCENDING PAIN INHIBITORY PATHWAY. ONE MAY HAVE PAIN(FULLNESS) WITHOUT SUFFERING AND SUFFERING WITHOUT PAIN(FULLNESS). PAIN SENSATION LEADS TO SUFFERING VIA A COGNITIVE, EMOTIONAL AND AUTONOMIC PROCESSING, AND IS EXPRESSED AS ANGER, FEAR, FRUSTRATION, ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION. THE MEDIAL PATHWAY OVERLAPS WITH THE SALIENCE AND STRESS NETWORKS, EXPLAINING THAT BEHAVIOURAL RELEVANCE OR MEANING DETERMINES THE SUFFERING ASSOCIATED WITH PAINFULNESS. GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC INFLUENCES TRIGGER CHRONIC NEUROINFLAMMATORY CHANGES WHICH ARE INVOLVED IN TRANSITIONING FROM ACUTE TO CHRONIC PAIN. BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF THE BAYESIAN BRAIN, PAIN (AND SUFFERING) CAN BE REGARDED AS THE CONSEQUENCE OF AN IMBALANCE BETWEEN THE TWO ASCENDING AND THE DESCENDING PAIN INHIBITORY PATHWAYS UNDER CONTROL OF THE REWARD SYSTEM. THE THERAPEUTIC CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THIS SIMPLE PAIN MODEL ARE OBVIOUS. AFTER CATEGORIZING THE WORKING MECHANISMS OF EACH OF THE AVAILABLE TREATMENTS (PAIN KILLERS, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, PSYCHOTHERAPY, NEUROMODULATION, PSYCHOSURGERY, SPINAL CORD STIMULATION) TO 1 OR MORE OF THE 3 PATHWAYS, A RATIONAL COMBINATION CAN BE PROPOSED OF ACTIVATING THE DESCENDING PAIN INHIBITORY PATHWAY IN COMBINATION WITH INHIBITION OF THE MEDIAL AND LATERAL PATHWAY, SO AS TO REBALANCE THE PAIN (AND SUFFERING) PATHWAYS. 2021 2 6846 36 [MIGRAINE: IGNITION OF THE BRAIN]. ALTHOUGH OUR KNOWLEDGE OF WHICH SYSTEMS ARE ACTIVATED DURING MIGRAINE IS REASONABLY COMPLETE, WHY THE SYSTEM IS ACTIVATED REMAINS UNKNOWN. INCORPORATING THE FINDINGS OBTAINED IN STUDIES ON PAIN IN GENERAL HAS ALLOWED A MORE INTEGRATED MODEL TO BE GENERATED. ACCORDING TO THIS NEW MODEL, THERE IS AN ANATOMICAL SUBSTRATE CONSISTING IN A COMPLEX FRAMEWORK OF PAIN THAT IS MADE UP NOT ONLY OF THE TRIGEMINOVASCULAR SYSTEM (END PATHWAY) BUT OF A NUMBER OF NETWORKS THAT ARE IN TURN CONNECTED TO ONE ANOTHER, LIKE THE NEUROLIMBIC, THE ASCENDING AND DESCENDING MODULATORY SYSTEM. THIS COMPLEX NETWORK IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MODULATING AND CONVEYING NOCICEPTIVE SIGNALS. IN PATIENTS WITH MIGRAINE, HYPEREXCITABILITY OF THIS FRAMEWORK IS CONDITIONED BY GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS. EPIGENETIC CHANGES ARE CHEMICAL MODIFICATIONS AFFECTING CHROMATIN, WHICH MODULATES THE ACTIVITY OF GENES WITHOUT MODIFYING THE DNA SEQUENCE, AND WHICH ARE CAPABLE OF MODULATING THE EXPRESSION OF GENES INVOLVED IN A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT ASPECTS, SUCH AS PLASTICITY, SYSTEM EXCITABILITY, MEMORY OF PAIN OR MOODS. IN TURN, THE PRESENCE OF EXTERNAL FACTORS (SUCH AS ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES OR ALCOHOL) AND INTERNAL FACTORS (SUCH AS HORMONES OR SLEEP DISORDERS) CONTRIBUTE TO ACTIVATE THIS LOADED ANATOMICAL SUBSTRATE, RESULTING IN THE ATTACK OF MIGRAINE. 2013 3 6866 37 [PAIN AND EMOTIONAL DYSREGULATION: CELLULAR MEMORY DUE TO PAIN]. GENETIC FACTORS ARE INVOLVED IN DETERMINANTS FOR THE RISK OF PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS, AND NEUROLOGICAL AND NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES. CHRONIC PAIN STIMULI AND INTENSE PAIN HAVE EFFECTS AT A CELLULAR AND/OR GENE EXPRESSION LEVEL, AND WILL EVENTUALLY INDUCE "CELLULAR MEMORY DUE TO PAIN", WHICH MEANS THAT TISSUE DAMAGE, EVEN IF ONLY TRANSIENT, CAN ELICIT EPIGENETICALLY ABNORMAL TRANSCRIPTION/TRANSLATION AND POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION IN RELATED CELLS DEPENDING ON THE DEGREE OR KIND OF INJURY OR ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS. SUCH CELL MEMORY/TRANSFORMATION DUE TO PAIN CAN CAUSE AN ABNORMALITY IN A FUNDAMENTAL INTRACELLULAR RESPONSE, SUCH AS A CHANGE IN THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF DNA, TRANSCRIPTION, OR TRANSLATION. ON THE OTHER HAND, PAIN IS A MULTIDIMENSIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH SENSORY-DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL-AFFECTIVE COMPONENTS. RECENT HUMAN BRAIN IMAGING STUDIES HAVE EXAMINED DIFFERENCES IN ACTIVITY IN THE NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS BETWEEN CONTROLS AND PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN, AND HAVE REVEALED THAT THE NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS PLAYS A ROLE IN PREDICTING THE VALUE OF A NOXIOUS STIMULUS AND ITS OFFSET, AND IN THE CONSEQUENT CHANGES IN THE MOTIVATIONAL STATE. IN THIS REVIEW, WE PROVIDE A VERY BRIEF OVERVIEW OF A COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSTANDING OF CHRONIC PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH EMOTIONAL DYSREGULATION DUE TO TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION, EPIGENETIC MODIFICATION AND MIRNA REGULATION. 2015 4 1796 36 EFFECT OF GERM-FREE STATUS ON TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILES IN THE NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS AND TRANSCRIPTOMIC RESPONSE TO CHRONIC MORPHINE. OPIOID USE DISORDER IS A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS THAT CAUSES TREMENDOUS SUFFERING FOR PATIENTS AS WELL AS SUBSTANTIAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC COSTS FOR SOCIETY. THERE ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TREATMENTS FOR PATIENTS WITH OPIOID USE DISORDER, BUT THEY REMAIN INTOLERABLE OR INEFFECTIVE FOR MANY. THUS THE NEED TO DEVELOP NEW AVENUES FOR THERAPEUTICS DEVELOPMENT IN THIS SPACE IS GREAT. SUBSTANTIAL WORK IN MODELS OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS, INCLUDING OPIOID USE DISORDER, DEMONSTRATES THAT PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO DRUGS OF ABUSE LEADS TO MARKED TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND EPIGENETIC DYSREGULATION IN LIMBIC SUBSTRUCTURES. IT IS WIDELY BELIEVED THAT THESE CHANGES IN GENE REGULATION IN RESPONSE TO DRUGS ARE A KEY DRIVING FACTOR IN THE PERPETUATION OF DRUG TAKING AND SEEKING BEHAVIORS. THUS, DEVELOPMENT OF INTERVENTIONS THAT COULD SHAPE TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION IN RESPONSE TO DRUGS OF ABUSE WOULD BE OF HIGH VALUE. OVER THE PAST DECADE THERE HAS BEEN A SURGE IN RESEARCH DEMONSTRATING THAT THE RESIDENT BACTERIA OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT, COLLECTIVELY THE GUT MICROBIOME, CAN HAVE TREMENDOUS INFLUENCE ON NEUROBIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY. PREVIOUS WORK FROM OUR GROUP AND OTHERS HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT ALTERATIONS IN THE GUT MICROBIOME CAN ALTER BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES TO OPIOIDS IN MULTIPLE PARADIGMS. ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED THAT DEPLETION OF THE GUT MICROBIOME WITH ANTIBIOTICS MARKEDLY SHIFTS THE TRANSCRIPTOME OF THE NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS FOLLOWING PROLONGED MORPHINE EXPOSURE. IN THIS MANUSCRIPT WE PRESENT A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE GUT MICROBIOME ON TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF THE NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS FOLLOWING MORPHINE BY UTILIZING GERM-FREE, ANTIBIOTIC TREATED, AND CONTROL MICE. THIS ALLOWS FOR DETAILED UNDERSTANDING OF THE ROLE OF THE MICROBIOME IN REGULATING BASELINE TRANSCRIPTOMIC CONTROL, AS WELL AS RESPONSE TO MORPHINE. WE FIND THAT GERM-FREE STATUS LEADS TO A MARKED GENE DYSREGULATION IN A MANNER DISTINCT TO ADULT MICE TREATED WITH ANTIBIOTICS, AND THAT ALTERED GENE PATHWAYS ARE HIGHLY RELATED TO CELLULAR METABOLIC PROCESSES. THESE DATA PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INSIGHT INTO THE ROLE OF THE GUT MICROBIOME IN MODULATING BRAIN FUNCTION AND LAY A FOUNDATION FOR FURTHER STUDY IN THIS AREA. 2023 5 2611 28 EPIGENETICS: A PROMISING PARADIGM FOR BETTER UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGING PAIN. EPIGENETIC REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION IS A RAPIDLY GROWING AREA OF RESEARCH. CONSIDERING THE LONGEVITY AND PLASTICITY OF NEURONS, THE STUDIES ON EPIGENETIC PATHWAYS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM SHOULD BE OF SPECIAL INTEREST FOR BOTH EPIGENETICISTS AND NEUROSCIENTISTS. ACTIVATION OR INACTIVATION OF DIFFERENT EPIGENETIC PATHWAYS BECOMES MORE PRONOUNCED WHEN THE CELLS EXPERIENCE RAPID CHANGES IN THEIR ENVIRONMENT, AND SUCH CHANGES CAN BE EASILY CAUSED BY INJURY AND INFLAMMATION, RESULTING IN PAIN PERCEPTION OR DISTORTION OF PAIN PERCEPTION (EG, HYPERALGESIA). THEREFORE, IN THIS REGARD, THE FIELD OF PAIN IS AT AN ADVANTAGE TO STUDY THE EPIGENETIC PATHWAYS. MORE IMPORTANTLY, UNDERSTANDING PAIN FROM AN EPIGENETICS POINT OF VIEW WOULD PROVIDE A NEW PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPING DRUGS OR STRATEGIES FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT. IN THIS REVIEW, WE INTRODUCE BASIC CONCEPTS OF EPIGENETICS, INCLUDING CHROMATIN DYNAMICS, HISTONE MODIFICATIONS, DNA METHYLATION, AND RNA-INDUCED GENE SILENCING. IN ADDITION, WE PROVIDE EVIDENCE FROM PUBLISHED STUDIES SUGGESTING WIDE IMPLICATION OF DIFFERENT EPIGENETIC PATHWAYS WITHIN PAIN PATHWAYS. PERSPECTIVE: THIS ARTICLE PROVIDES A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF EPIGENETIC PATHWAYS FOR GENE REGULATION AND HIGHLIGHTS THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN PAIN. OUR GOAL IS TO EXPOSE THE READERS TO THESE CONCEPTS SO THAT PAIN-RELATED PHENOTYPES CAN BE INVESTIGATED FROM THE EPIGENETIC POINT OF VIEW. 2013 6 2963 26 GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS LINKING PAIN AND PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS. THE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL LINK BETWEEN NEUROPATHIC PAIN AND DEPRESSION REMAINS UNKNOWN DESPITE EVIDENT HIGH COMORBIDITY OF THESE TWO DISORDERS. HOWEVER, THERE IS CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT GENOTYPE PLAYS A ROLE IN BOTH PAIN AND DEPRESSION. USING VARIOUS TYPES OF GENETIC ANALYSIS - POPULATION GENETICS, CYTOGENETICS AND MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGIES - SPECIFIC GENES HAVE BEEN IMPLICATED IN MEDIATING ALMOST ALL ASPECTS OF NOCICEPTION AND MOOD DISORDERS. THE CURRENT REVIEW ATTEMPTS TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC GENES AND EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS COMMON TO BOTH DISORDERS. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL FACTORS (INFLAMMATION, STRESS, GENDER, ETC.) THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PATHOLOGIES MAY DO SO THROUGH EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS THAT MAY AFFECT EXPRESSION OF THESE PARTICULAR GENES. THE POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF EPIGENETIC REGULATION IN PAIN AND PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS SUGGESTS THAT TREATMENTS TARGETING EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS THAT MEDIATE ADVERSE LIFE EVENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. 2015 7 5038 22 PHARMACOGENETICS OF CHRONIC PAIN AND ITS TREATMENT. THIS PAPER REVIEWS THE IMPACT OF GENETIC VARIABILITY OF DRUG METABOLIZING ENZYMES, TRANSPORTERS, RECEPTORS, AND PATHWAYS INVOLVED IN CHRONIC PAIN PERCEPTION ON THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ANALGESICS AND OTHER DRUGS USED FOR CHRONIC PAIN TREATMENT. SEVERAL CANDIDATE GENES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE LITERATURE, WHILE THERE IS USUALLY ONLY LIMITED CLINICAL EVIDENCE SUBSTANTIATING FOR THE PENETRATION OF THE TESTING FOR THESE CANDIDATE BIOMARKERS INTO THE CLINICAL PRACTICE. FURTHER, THE PAIN-PERCEPTION REGULATION AND MODULATION ARE STILL NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD, AND THUS MORE COMPLEX KNOWLEDGE OF GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC BACKGROUND FOR ANALGESIA WILL BE NEEDED PRIOR TO THE CLINICAL USE OF THE CANDIDATE GENETIC BIOMARKERS. 2013 8 2176 31 EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS OF CHRONIC PAIN. NEUROPATHIC AND INFLAMMATORY PAIN PROMOTE A LARGE NUMBER OF PERSISTING ADAPTATIONS AT THE CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LEVEL, ALLOWING EVEN TRANSIENT TISSUE OR NERVE DAMAGE TO ELICIT CHANGES IN CELLS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN AND ASSOCIATED SYMPTOMS. THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT INJURY-INDUCED CHANGES IN CHROMATIN STRUCTURE DRIVE STABLE CHANGES IN GENE EXPRESSION AND NEURAL FUNCTION, WHICH MAY CAUSE SEVERAL SYMPTOMS, INCLUDING ALLODYNIA, HYPERALGESIA, ANXIETY, AND DEPRESSION. RECENT FINDINGS ON EPIGENETIC CHANGES IN THE SPINAL CORD AND BRAIN DURING CHRONIC PAIN MAY GUIDE FUNDAMENTAL ADVANCES IN NEW TREATMENTS. HERE, WE PROVIDE A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF EPIGENETIC REGULATION IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND THEN DISCUSS THE STILL-LIMITED LITERATURE THAT DIRECTLY IMPLICATES EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONS IN CHRONIC PAIN SYNDROMES. 2015 9 1984 28 EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS IN PRESCRIPTION OPIOID MISUSE: NEW STRATEGIES FOR PRECISION PAIN MANAGEMENT. PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS ARE USED FOR SOME CHRONIC PAIN CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, GENERALLY, LONG-TERM THERAPY HAS UNWANTED SIDE EFFECTS WHICH MAY TRIGGER ADDICTION, OVERDOSE, AND EVENTUALLY CAUSE DEATHS. OPIOID ADDICTION AND CHRONIC PAIN CONDITIONS HAVE BOTH BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH EVIDENCE OF GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS. DESPITE INTENSE RESEARCH INTEREST, MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTION OF EPIGENETIC CHANGES TO THIS TYPOLOGY OF ADDICTION VULNERABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT REMAIN UNANSWERED. THE AIM OF THIS REVIEW WAS TO SUMMARIZE THE EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONS DETECTED IN SPECIFIC TISSUES OR BRAIN AREAS AND ASSOCIATED WITH OPIOID PRESCRIPTION AND MISUSE IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE INITIATED PRESCRIBED OPIOID MANAGEMENT FOR CHRONIC NON-CANCER PAIN. THE REVIEW CONSIDERS THE EFFECTS OF OPIOID EXPOSURE ON THE EPIGENOME IN CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL TISSUES IN ANIMAL MODELS AND HUMAN SUBJECTS AND HIGHLIGHTS THE MECHANISMS IN WHICH OPIOID EPIGENETICS MAY BE INVOLVED. THIS WILL IMPROVE OUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING, PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR TARGETED, PERSONALIZED PAIN MANAGEMENT, AND THUS BALANCE OPIOID RISKS AND BENEFITS IN MANAGING CHRONIC PAIN. 2021 10 5926 36 TARGETING EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS FOR CHRONIC PAIN: A VALID APPROACH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL THERAPEUTICS. CHRONIC PAIN IS A MULTIFACETED AND COMPLEX CONDITION. BROADLY CLASSIFIED INTO SOMATIC, VISCERAL, OR NEUROPATHIC PAIN, IT IS POORLY MANAGED DESPITE ITS PREVALENCE. CURRENT DRUGS USED FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN ARE LIMITED BY TOLERANCE WITH LONG-TERM USE, ABUSE POTENTIAL, AND MULTIPLE ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS. THE PERSISTENT NATURE OF PAIN SUGGESTS THAT EPIGENETIC MACHINERY MAY BE A CRITICAL FACTOR DRIVING CHRONIC PAIN. IN THIS REVIEW, WE DISCUSS THE LATEST INSIGHTS INTO EPIGENETIC PROCESSES, INCLUDING DNA METHYLATION, HISTONE MODIFICATIONS, AND MICRORNAS, AND WE DESCRIBE THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF CHRONIC PAIN AND WHETHER EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONS COULD BE APPLIED AS FUTURE THERAPEUTIC TARGETS FOR CHRONIC PAIN. WE PROVIDE EVIDENCE FROM EXPERIMENTAL MODELS AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH IN HUMAN TISSUE THAT HAVE ENHANCED OUR UNDERSTANDING OF EPIGENETIC PROCESSES MEDIATING NOCICEPTION, AND WE THEN SPECULATE ON THE POTENTIAL FUTURE USE OF MORE SPECIFIC AND SELECTIVE AGENTS THAT TARGET EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS TO ATTENUATE PAIN. 2016 11 5928 24 TARGETING EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS FOR PAIN RELIEF. EPIGENETIC CHANGES ARE CHEMICAL MODIFICATIONS TO CHROMATIN THAT MODULATE GENE ACTIVITY WITHOUT ALTERING THE DNA SEQUENCE. WHILE RESEARCH ON EPIGENETICS HAS GROWN EXPONENTIALLY OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS, VERY FEW STUDIES HAVE INVESTIGATED EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS IN RELATION TO PAIN STATES. HOWEVER, EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS ARE CRUCIAL TO MEMORY FORMATION THAT REQUIRES SIMILAR SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY TO PAIN PROCESSING, INDICATING THAT THEY MAY PLAY A KEY ROLE IN THE CONTROL OF PAIN STATES. THIS ARTICLE REVIEWS THE EARLY EVIDENCE SUGGESTING THAT EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS ARE ENGAGED AFTER INJURY AND IN CHRONIC PAIN STATES, AND THAT DRUGS USED CLINICALLY TO TARGET THE EPIGENETIC MACHINERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER MIGHT BE USEFUL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN. 2012 12 2252 30 EPIGENETIC MODULATION OF VISCERAL NOCICEPTION. EPIGENETICS IS A PROCESS THAT ALTERS GENE ACTIVITY OR PHENOTYPE WITHOUT ANY CHANGES IN THE UNDERLYING DNA SEQUENCE OR GENOTYPE. THESE BIOLOGICAL CHANGES MAY HAVE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS AND CAN LEAD TO VARIOUS HUMAN DISEASES. ONGOING RESEARCH IS CONTINUING TO ILLUMINATE THE ROLE OF EPIGENETICS IN A VARIETY OF PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC PROCESSES. SEVERAL CATEGORIES OF EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS HAVE BEEN STUDIED INCLUDING CHROMATIN REMODELING, DNA METHYLATION, HISTONE MODIFICATION, AND NON-CODING RNA MECHANISMS. THESE EPIGENETIC CHANGES CAN HAVE A LONG-TERM EFFECT ON GENE EXPRESSION WITHOUT ANY UNDERLYING CHANGES IN THE DNA SEQUENCES. THE UNDERLYING PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF DISORDERS OF BRAIN-GUT INTERACTION AND STRESS-INDUCED VISCERAL PAIN ARE NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD AND THE ROLE OF EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS IN THESE DISORDERS ARE STARTING TO BE BETTER UNDERSTOOD. CURRENT WORK IS UNDERWAY TO DETERMINE HOW EPIGENETICS PLAYS A ROLE IN THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC VISCERAL PAIN AND HEIGHTENED VISCERAL NOCICEPTION. MORE RECENTLY, BOTH ANIMAL MODELS AND HUMAN STUDIES HAVE SHOWN HOW EPIGENETIC REGULATION MODULATES STRESS-INDUCED VISCERAL PAIN. WHILE MUCH MORE WORK IS NEEDED TO FULLY DELINEATE THE MECHANISTIC ROLE OF EPIGENETICS IN THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF CHRONIC VISCERAL NOCICEPTION, THE CURRENT STUDY BY LOUWIES ET AL., IN NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY PROVIDES ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE INVOLVEMENT OF EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS IN THE CENTRAL NUCLEUS OF THE AMYGDALA IN STRESS-INDUCED VISCERAL HYPERSENSITIVITY IN RODENTS. 2022 13 38 31 A COMMON ROLE FOR PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS: MEMORY IMPAIRMENT. THE PSYCHOPATHOLOGIC PROFILE OF MENTAL DISORDERS IS VERY DIVERSE AND PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS USED TO TREAT THEM DIFFER IN THEIR CHEMICAL STRUCTURE. NEVERTHELESS, THESE DRUGS SHARE THESE FOUR CHARACTERISTICS: DELAYED ONSET OF CLINICAL RESPONSE, NOT ONE OF THEM CAN BE SAID TO CURE, THERE IS A HIGH NUMBER OF NON-RESPONDERS, AND THE MECHANISM RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR THERAPEUTIC ACTION IS NOT KNOWN. IT IS HYPOTHESIZED THAT THE ACTION OF PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS IS MEMORY IMPAIRMENT, UNDERSTANDING MEMORY AS THE TRACE LEFT IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM NOT ONLY BY INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCES BUT ALSO BY GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC PHENOMENA. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO TRANSLATE SOME RESEARCH STRATEGIES FROM THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY TO THE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS. THE HYPOTHESIS IS BRIEFLY ASSESSED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING THREE CRITERIA: (A). THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MOLECULAR EFFECTS OF PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS AND THE SO-CALLED MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, (B). THE EFFECTS OF THESE DRUGS, PREFERENTIALLY AFTER CHRONIC USE, ON MEMORY TESTS, AND (C). THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS THAT IMPAIR MEMORY ON TESTS USED FOR SCREENING PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS. FINALLY, SOME GENERAL SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH ARE POINTED OUT. 2003 14 1686 36 DRUGGING THE PAIN EPIGENOME. MORE THAN 20% OF ADULTS WORLDWIDE EXPERIENCE DIFFERENT TYPES OF CHRONIC PAIN, WHICH ARE FREQUENTLY ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERAL COMORBIDITIES AND A DECREASE IN QUALITY OF LIFE. SEVERAL APPROVED PAINKILLERS ARE AVAILABLE, BUT CURRENT ANALGESICS ARE OFTEN HAMPERED BY INSUFFICIENT EFFICACY AND/OR SEVERE ADVERSE EFFECTS. CONSEQUENTLY, NOVEL STRATEGIES FOR SAFE, HIGHLY EFFICACIOUS TREATMENTS ARE HIGHLY DESIRABLE, PARTICULARLY FOR CHRONIC PAIN. EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS SUCH AS DNA METHYLATION, HISTONE MODIFICATIONS AND MICRORNAS (MIRNAS) STRONGLY AFFECT THE REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION, POTENTIALLY FOR LONG PERIODS OVER YEARS OR EVEN GENERATIONS, AND HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL PAIN. SEVERAL STUDIES, MOSTLY IN ANIMALS, REVEALED THAT INHIBITORS OF DNA METHYLATION, ACTIVATORS AND INHIBITORS OF HISTONE MODIFICATION AND MODULATORS OF MIRNAS REVERSE A NUMBER OF PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE PAIN EPIGENOME, WHICH ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ALTERED EXPRESSION OF PAIN-RELEVANT GENES. THIS EPIGENETIC MODULATION MIGHT THEN REDUCE THE NOCICEPTIVE RESPONSE AND PROVIDE NOVEL THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS FOR ANALGESIC THERAPY OF CHRONIC PAIN STATES. HOWEVER, A NUMBER OF CHALLENGES, SUCH AS NONSPECIFIC EFFECTS AND POOR DELIVERY TO TARGET CELLS AND TISSUES, HINDER THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT OF SUCH ANALGESICS. IN THIS REVIEW, WE CRITICALLY SUMMARIZE DATA ON EPIGENETICS AND PAIN, FOCUSING ON CHALLENGES IN CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS POSSIBLE NEW APPROACHES TO THE DRUG MODULATION OF THE PAIN EPIGENOME. 2017 15 1509 26 DNA METHYLATION AND NON-CODING RNAS DURING TISSUE-INJURY ASSOCIATED PAIN. WHILE ABOUT HALF OF THE POPULATION EXPERIENCE PERSISTENT PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH TISSUE DAMAGES DURING THEIR LIFETIME, CURRENT SYMPTOM-BASED APPROACHES OFTEN FAIL TO REDUCE SUCH PAIN TO A SATISFACTORY LEVEL. TO PROVIDE BETTER PATIENT CARE, MECHANISM-BASED ANALGESIC APPROACHES MUST BE DEVELOPED, WHICH NECESSITATES A COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE NOCICEPTIVE MECHANISM LEADING TO TISSUE INJURY-ASSOCIATED PERSISTENT PAIN. EPIGENETIC EVENTS LEADING THE ALTERED TRANSCRIPTION IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM ARE PIVOTAL IN THE MAINTENANCE OF PAIN IN TISSUE INJURY. HOWEVER, THE MECHANISMS THROUGH WHICH THOSE EVENTS CONTRIBUTE TO THE PERSISTENCE OF PAIN ARE NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD. THIS REVIEW PROVIDES A SUMMARY AND CRITICAL EVALUATION OF TWO EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS, DNA METHYLATION AND NON-CODING RNA EXPRESSION, ON TRANSCRIPTIONAL MODULATION IN NOCICEPTIVE PATHWAYS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TISSUE INJURY-ASSOCIATED PAIN. WE ASSESS THE PRE-CLINICAL DATA AND THEIR TRANSLATIONAL IMPLICATION AND EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL OF CONTROLLING DNA METHYLATION AND NON-CODING RNA EXPRESSION AS NOVEL ANALGESIC APPROACHES AND/OR BIOMARKERS OF PERSISTENT PAIN. 2022 16 6260 27 THE MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY OF CHRONIC PAIN-INDUCED DEPRESSION. THE INCREASING NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WITH COMORBIDITIES POSES AN URGENT NEED TO IMPROVE THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE CO-EXISTING DISEASES. AMONG THESE COMORBIDITIES, CHRONIC PAIN AND MOOD DISORDERS, TWO LONG-LASTING DISABLING CONDITIONS THAT SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE, COULD BE CITED FIRST. THE RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF ANIMAL MODELS ACCELERATED THE STUDIES FOCUSING ON THE UNDERLYING MECHANISMS OF THE CHRONIC PAIN AND DEPRESSION/ANXIETY COMORBIDITY. THIS REVIEW PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL AND PRE-CLINICAL STUDIES PERFORMED OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES ADDRESSING THE MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF THE COMORBID RELATIONSHIP OF CHRONIC PAIN AND DEPRESSION. WE THUS FOCUSED ON THE STUDIES THAT INVESTIGATED THE MOLECULAR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMORBID RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRONIC PAIN AND MOOD DISORDERS, ESPECIALLY MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS, FROM THE GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC POINT OF VIEW TO KEY NEUROMODULATORS WHICH HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THIS COMORBIDITY. 2019 17 5649 23 SEX DIFFERENCES IN PSYCHOSTIMULANT ABUSE: IMPLICATIONS FOR ESTROGEN RECEPTORS AND HISTONE DEACETYLASES. SUBSTANCE ABUSE IS A CHRONIC PATHOLOGICAL DISORDER THAT NEGATIVELY AFFECTS MANY HEALTH AND NEUROLOGICAL PROCESSES. A GROWING BODY OF LITERATURE HAS REVEALED GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SUBSTANCE USE. COMPARED TO MEN, WOMEN DISPLAY DISTINCT DRUG-USE PHENOTYPES ACCOMPANIED BY RECOVERY AND REHABILITATION DISPARITIES. THESE OBSERVATIONS HAVE LED TO THE NOTION THAT SEX-DEPENDENT SUSCEPTIBILITIES EXIST ALONG THE PROGRESSION TO ADDICTION. WITHIN THIS SCOPE, NEUROADAPTATIONS FOLLOWING PSYCHOSTIMULANT EXPOSURE ARE THOUGHT TO BE DISTINCT FOR EACH SEX. THIS REVIEW SUMMARIZES CLINICAL FINDINGS AND ANIMAL RESEARCH REPORTING SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE SUBJECTIVE AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES TO COCAINE, METHAMPHETAMINE, AND NICOTINE. THIS DISCUSSION IS FOLLOWED BY AN EXAMINATION OF EPIGENETIC AND MOLECULAR ALTERATIONS IMPLICATED IN THE ADDICTION PROCESS. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO HISTONE DEACETYLASES AND ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-MEDIATED GENE EXPRESSION. 2022 18 4642 39 NEURONAL PLASTICITY: A LINK BETWEEN STRESS AND MOOD DISORDERS. ALTHOUGH STRESS REPRESENTS THE MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT OF SUSCEPTIBILITY FOR MOOD DISORDERS, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRESS AND DISEASE REMAINS TO BE FULLY ESTABLISHED. IN THE PRESENT ARTICLE WE REVIEW THE EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT FOR A ROLE OF NEURONAL PLASTICITY, AND IN PARTICULAR OF NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS. EVEN THOUGH DECREASED LEVELS OF NOREPINEPHRINE AND SEROTONIN MAY UNDERLIE DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS, COMPELLING EVIDENCE NOW SUGGESTS THAT MOOD DISORDERS ARE CHARACTERIZED BY REDUCED NEURONAL PLASTICITY, WHICH CAN BE BROUGHT ABOUT BY EXPOSURE TO STRESS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF LIFE. INDEED THE EXPRESSION OF NEUROTROPHIC MOLECULES, SUCH AS THE NEUROTROPHIN BDNF, IS REDUCED IN DEPRESSED SUBJECTS AS WELL AS IN EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS EXPOSED TO ADVERSE EXPERIENCE AT EARLY STAGES OF LIFE OR AT ADULTHOOD. THESE CHANGES SHOW AN ANATOMICAL SPECIFICITY AND MIGHT BE SUSTAINED BY EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS. PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTION MAY NORMALIZE SUCH DEFECTS AND IMPROVE NEURONAL FUNCTION THROUGH THE MODULATION OF THE SAME FACTORS THAT ARE DEFECTIVE IN DEPRESSION. SEVERAL STUDIES HAVE DEMONSTRATED THAT CHRONIC, BUT NOT ACUTE, ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT INCREASES THE EXPRESSION OF BDNF AND MAY ENHANCE ITS LOCALIZATION AT SYNAPTIC LEVEL. ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT CAN NORMALIZE DEFICITS IN NEUROTROPHIN EXPRESSION PRODUCED BY CHRONIC STRESS PARADIGMS, BUT MAY ALSO ALTER THE MODULATION OF BDNF UNDER ACUTE STRESSFUL CONDITIONS. IN SUMMARY, THERE IS GOOD AGREEMENT IN CONSIDERING NEURONAL PLASTICITY, AND THE EXPRESSION OF KEY PROTEINS SUCH AS THE NEUROTROPHIN BDNF, AS A CENTRAL PLAYER FOR THE EFFECTS OF STRESS ON BRAIN FUNCTION AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR PSYCHOPATHOLOGY. ACCORDINGLY, EFFECTIVE TREATMENTS SHOULD NOT LIMIT THEIR EFFECTS TO THE CONTROL OF NEUROTRANSMITTER AND HORMONAL DYSFUNCTIONS, BUT SHOULD BE ABLE TO NORMALIZE DEFECTIVE MECHANISMS THAT SUSTAIN THE IMPAIRMENT OF NEURONAL PLASTICITY. 2009 19 534 31 ASTROGLIA IN THE VULNERABILITY TO AND MAINTENANCE OF STRESS-MEDIATED NEUROPATHOLOGY AND DEPRESSION. SIGNIFICANT STRESS EXPOSURE AND PSYCHIATRIC DEPRESSION ARE ASSOCIATED WITH MORPHOLOGICAL, BIOCHEMICAL, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL DISTURBANCES OF ASTROCYTES IN SPECIFIC BRAIN REGIONS RELEVANT TO THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF THOSE DISORDERS, SUGGESTING THAT ASTROCYTES ARE INVOLVED IN THE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE VULNERABILITY TO OR MAINTENANCE OF STRESS-RELATED NEUROPATHOLOGY AND DEPRESSION. TO UNDERSTAND THOSE MECHANISMS A VARIETY OF STUDIES HAVE PROBED THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS MODALITIES OF STRESS EXPOSURE ON THE METABOLISM, GENE EXPRESSION AND PLASTICITY OF ASTROCYTES. THESE STUDIES HAVE UNCOVERED THE PARTICIPATION OF VARIOUS CELLULAR PATHWAYS, SUCH AS THOSE FOR INTRACELLULAR CALCIUM REGULATION, NEUROIMMUNE RESPONSES, EXTRACELLULAR IONIC REGULATION, GAP JUNCTIONS-BASED CELLULAR COMMUNICATION, AND REGULATION OF NEUROTRANSMITTER AND GLIOTRANSMITTER RELEASE AND UPTAKE. MORE RECENTLY EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONS RESULTING FROM EXPOSURE TO CHRONIC FORMS OF STRESS OR TO EARLY LIFE ADVERSITY HAVE BEEN SUGGESTED TO AFFECT NOT ONLY NEURONAL MECHANISMS BUT ALSO GENE EXPRESSION AND PHYSIOLOGY OF ASTROCYTES AND OTHER GLIAL CELLS. HOWEVER, MUCH REMAINS TO BE LEARNED TO UNDERSTAND THE SPECIFIC ROLE OF THOSE AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS IN THE ASTROGLIAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE VULNERABILITY TO AND MAINTENANCE OF STRESS-RELATED DISORDERS AND DEPRESSION, AND FOR LEVERAGING THAT KNOWLEDGE TO ACHIEVE MORE EFFECTIVE PSYCHIATRIC THERAPIES. 2022 20 6174 44 THE HIPPOCAMPUS, NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS AND DEPRESSION: POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PHARMACOTHERAPY OF DEPRESSION. DEPRESSION IS A PREVALENT, HIGHLY DEBILITATING MENTAL DISORDER AFFECTING UP TO 15% OF THE POPULATION AT LEAST ONCE IN THEIR LIFETIME, WITH HUGE COSTS FOR SOCIETY. NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF DEPRESSION ARE STILL NOT WELL KNOWN, ALTHOUGH THERE IS CONSENSUS ABOUT INTERPLAY BETWEEN GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS. ANTIDEPRESSANT MEDICATIONS ARE FREQUENTLY USED IN DEPRESSION, BUT AT LEAST 50% OF PATIENTS ARE POOR RESPONDERS, EVEN TO MORE RECENTLY DISCOVERED MEDICATIONS. FURTHERMORE, CLINICAL RESPONSE ONLY OCCURS FOLLOWING WEEKS TO MONTHS OF TREATMENT AND ONLY CHRONIC TREATMENT IS EFFECTIVE, SUGGESTING THAT ACTIONS BEYOND THE RAPIDLY OCCURRING EFFECT OF ENHANCING MONOAMINERGIC SYSTEMS, SUCH AS ADAPTATION OF THESE SYSTEMS, ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EFFECTS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS. RECENT STUDIES INDICATE THAT AN IMPAIRMENT OF SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY (NEUROGENESIS, AXON BRANCHING, DENDRITOGENESIS AND SYNAPTOGENESIS) IN SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CNS, PARTICULARLY THE HIPPOCAMPUS, MAY BE A CORE FACTOR IN THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF DEPRESSION. THE ABNORMAL NEURAL PLASTICITY MAY BE RELATED TO ALTERATIONS IN THE LEVELS OF NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS, NAMELY BRAIN-DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR (BDNF), WHICH PLAY A CENTRAL ROLE IN PLASTICITY. AS BDNF IS REPRESSED BY STRESS, EPIGENETIC REGULATION OF THE BDNF GENE MAY PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN DEPRESSION. THE HIPPOCAMPUS IS SMALLER IN DEPRESSED PATIENTS, ALTHOUGH IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER SMALLER SIZE IS A CONSEQUENCE OF DEPRESSION OR A PRE-EXISTING, VULNERABILITY MARKER FOR DEPRESSION. ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSORS TRIGGERING ACTIVATION OF THE HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY-ADRENAL AXIS CAUSE THE BRAIN TO BE EXPOSED TO CORTICOSTEROIDS, AFFECTING NEUROBEHAVIOURAL FUNCTIONS WITH A STRONG DOWNREGULATION OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS, AND ARE A MAJOR RISK FACTOR FOR DEPRESSION. ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT INCREASES BDNF LEVELS, STIMULATES NEUROGENESIS AND REVERSES THE INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF STRESS, BUT THIS EFFECT IS EVIDENT ONLY AFTER 3-4 WEEKS OF ADMINISTRATION, THE TIME COURSE FOR MATURATION OF NEW NEURONS. THE ABLATION OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS BLOCKS THE BEHAVIOURAL EFFECTS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS IN ANIMAL MODELS. THE ABOVE FINDINGS SUGGEST NEW POSSIBLE TARGETS FOR THE PHARMACOTHERAPY OF DEPRESSION SUCH AS NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS, THEIR RECEPTORS AND RELATED INTRACELLULAR SIGNALLING CASCADES; AGENTS COUNTERACTING THE EFFECTS OF STRESS ON HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS (INCLUDING ANTAGONISTS OF CORTICOSTEROIDS, INFLAMMATORY CYTOKINES AND THEIR RECEPTORS); AND AGENTS FACILITATING THE ACTIVATION OF GENE EXPRESSION AND INCREASING THE TRANSCRIPTION OF NEUROTROPHINS IN THE BRAIN. 2011