1 4562 162 MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM OVERLAP SYNDROMES: A FOCUSED REVIEW. MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME (MDS)/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM (MPN) OVERLAP SYNDROMES ARE UNIQUE MYELOID NEOPLASMS, WITH OVERLAPPING FEATURES OF MDS AND MPN. THEY CONSIST OF FOUR ADULT ONSET ENTITIES INCLUDING CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), MDS/MPN-RING SIDEROBLASTS-THROMBOCYTOSIS (MDS/MPN-RS-T), BCR-ABL1 NEGATIVE ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA (ACML) AND MDS/MPN-UNCLASSIFIABLE (MDS/MPN-U); WITH JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (JMML) BEING THE ONLY PEDIATRIC ONSET ENTITY. AMONG THESE OVERLAP NEOPLASMS, CMML IS THE MOST FREQUENT AND IS HALLMARKED BY THE PRESENCE OF SUSTAINED PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS WITH RECURRENT MUTATIONS INVOLVING TET2 (60%), SRSF2 (50%) AND ASXL1 (40%); WITH RAS PATHWAY MUTATIONS AND JAK2V617F BEING RELATIVELY ENRICHED IN PROLIFERATIVE CMML SUBTYPES (WBC >/=13 X 109/L). CMML USUALLY PRESENTS IN THE 7TH DECADE OF LIFE, WITH A MALE PREPONDERANCE AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH A MEDIAN OVERALL SURVIVAL OF <36 MONTHS. ADVERSE PROGNOSTICATORS IN CMML INCLUDE INCREASING AGE, HIGH WBC, PRESENCE OF CIRCULATING IMMATURE MYELOID CELLS, ANEMIA, THROMBOCYTOPENIA AND TRUNCATING ASXL1 MUTATIONS. WHILE ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION REMAINS THE ONLY CURATIVE OPTION, GIVEN THE LATE ONSET OF THIS NEOPLASM AND HIGH FREQUENCY OF COMORBIDITIES, MOST PATIENTS REMAIN INELIGIBLE. HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS SUCH AS AZACITIDINE, DECITABINE AND ORAL DECITABINE/CEDAZURIDINE HAVE BEEN US FDA APPROVED FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CMML, WITH OVERALL RESPONSE RATES OF 40-50% AND COMPLETE REMISSION RATES OF <20%. WHILE THESE AGENTS EPIGENETICALLY RESTORE HEMATOPOIESIS IN A SUBSET OF RESPONDING PATIENTS, THEY DO NOT IMPACT MUTATIONAL ALLELE BURDENS AND EVENTUAL DISEASE PROGRESSION TO AML REMAINS INEVITABLE. NEWER TREATMENT MODALITIES EXPLOITING EPIGENETIC, SIGNALING AND SPLICING ABNORMALITIES COMMONLY SEEN IN CMML ARE MUCH NEEDED. 2020 2 962 71 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: FOCUS ON CLINICAL PRACTICE. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL STEM CELL DISORDER WITH FEATURES THAT OVERLAP THOSE OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDSS) AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPNS). CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA OFTEN RESULTS IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS AND HAS AN INHERENT TENDENCY TO TRANSFORM TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA. CLONAL CYTOGENETIC CHANGES ARE SEEN IN APPROXIMATELY 30% OF PATIENTS, AND MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES ARE SEEN IN MORE THAN 90%. GENE MUTATIONS INVOLVING TET2 ( APPROXIMATELY 60%), SRSF2 ( APPROXIMATELY 50%), ASXL1 ( APPROXIMATELY 40%), AND RAS ( APPROXIMATELY 30%) ARE FREQUENT, WITH NONSENSE AND FRAMESHIFT ASXL1 MUTATIONS BEING THE ONLY MUTATIONS IDENTIFIED THUS FAR TO HAVE AN INDEPENDENT NEGATIVE PROGNOSTIC EFFECT ON OVERALL SURVIVAL. CONTEMPORARY MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED PROGNOSTIC MODELS (INCLUSIVE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS) INCLUDE THE MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL AND THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES MODEL. GIVEN THE LACK OF FORMAL TREATMENT AND RESPONSE CRITERIA, MANAGEMENT OF CMML IS OFTEN EXTRAPOLATED FROM MDS AND MPN, WITH ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT BEING THE ONLY CURATIVE OPTION. HYDROXYUREA AND OTHER CYTOREDUCTIVE AGENTS HAVE BEEN USED TO CONTROL MPN-LIKE FEATURES, WHILE EPIGENETIC MODIFIERS SUCH AS HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS HAVE BEEN USED FOR MDS-LIKE FEATURES. GIVEN THE RELATIVELY POOR RESPONSE TO THESE AGENTS AND THE INHERENT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT, NEWER DRUGS EXPLOITING MOLECULAR AND EPIGENETIC ABNORMALITIES IN CMML ARE BEING DEVELOPED. THE CREATION OF CMML-SPECIFIC RESPONSE CRITERIA IS A MUCH NEEDED STEP IN ORDER TO IMPROVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES. 2016 3 961 60 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: A GENETIC AND CLINICAL UPDATE. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL STEM CELL DISORDER, CHARACTERIZED BY PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS AND OVERLAPPING FEATURES BETWEEN MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS) AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPNS). CLONAL CYTOGENETIC CHANGES ARE SEEN IN UP TO 30 % PATIENTS, WHILE APPROXIMATELY 90 % HAVE DETECTABLE MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES. MOST PATIENTS ARE DIAGNOSED IN THE SEVENTH DECADE OF LIFE. GENE MUTATIONS IN TEN-ELEVEN TRANSLOCATION (TET) ONCOGENE FAMILY MEMBER 2 (TET2) (60 %), SRSF2 (50 %), ASXL1 (40 %), AND RAS (20-30 %) ARE FREQUENT, WITH ONLY FRAME SHIFT AND NONSENSE ASXL1 MUTATIONS NEGATIVELY IMPACTING OVERALL SURVIVAL. WITH THE LACK OF FORMAL GUIDELINES, MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE CRITERIA ARE OFTEN EXTRAPOLATED FROM MDS AND MPN. CONTEMPORARY MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED CMML-SPECIFIC PROGNOSTIC MODELS INCLUDE THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES (GFM) MODEL AND THE MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL, BOTH INCORPORATING ASXL1 MUTATIONAL STATUS. HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS AND ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT REMAIN THE TWO MOST COMMONLY USED TREATMENT STRATEGIES, WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESULTS. CLINICAL TRIALS EXPLOITING EPIGENETIC AND SIGNAL PATHWAY ABNORMALITIES, FREQUENT IN CMML, OFFER HOPE AND PROMISE. 2015 4 4557 29 MUTATIONS IN ASXL1 ARE ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS ACROSS THE SPECTRUM OF MALIGNANT MYELOID DISEASES. THE ASXL1 GENE IS ONE OF THE MOST FREQUENTLY MUTATED GENES IN MALIGNANT MYELOID DISEASES. THE ASXL1 PROTEIN BELONGS TO PROTEIN COMPLEXES INVOLVED IN THE EPIGENETIC REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION. ASXL1 MUTATIONS ARE FOUND IN MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPN), MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) AND ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML). THEY ARE GENERALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SIGNS OF AGGRESSIVENESS AND POOR CLINICAL OUTCOME. BECAUSE OF THIS, A SYSTEMATIC DETERMINATION OF ASXL1 MUTATIONAL STATUS IN MYELOID MALIGNANCIES SHOULD HELP IN PROGNOSIS ASSESSMENT. 2012 5 4471 41 MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF ATYPICAL CML, CMML AND MDS/MPN-UNCLASSIFIABLE. ACCORDING TO THE 2008 WHO CLASSIFICATION, THE CATEGORY OF MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MDS/MPN) INCLUDES ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA (ACML), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA (CMML), MDS/MPN-UNCLASSIFIABLE (MDS/MPN-U), JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA (JMML) AND A "PROVISIONAL" ENTITY, REFRACTORY ANAEMIA WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS AND THROMBOCYTOSIS (RARS-T). THE REMARKABLE PROGRESS IN OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOMATIC PATHOGENESIS OF MDS/MPN HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT THERE IS CONSIDERABLE OVERLAP AMONG THESE DISEASES AT THE MOLECULAR LEVEL, AS WELL AS LAYERS OF UNEXPECTED COMPLEXITY. DEREGULATION OF SIGNALLING PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN MANY CASES, AND IS CLEARLY LINKED TO MORE HIGHLY PROLIFERATIVE DISEASE. OTHER MUTATIONS AFFECT A RANGE OF OTHER ESSENTIAL, INTERRELATED CELLULAR MECHANISMS, INCLUDING EPIGENETIC REGULATION, RNA SPLICING, TRANSCRIPTION, AND DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE. THE VARIOUS COMBINATIONS OF MUTATIONS INDICATE A MULTI-STEP PATHOGENESIS, WHICH LIKELY CONTRIBUTES TO THE MARKED CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY OF THESE DISORDERS. THE DELINEATION OF COMPLEX CLONAL ARCHITECTURES MAY SERVE AS THE CORNERSTONE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL THERAPEUTIC TARGETS AND LEAD TO BETTER PATIENT OUTCOMES. THIS REVIEW SUMMARIZES SOME OF THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE OF MOLECULAR PATHOGENETIC LESIONS IN THE MDS/MPN SUBTYPES THAT ARE SEEN IN ADULTS: ATYPICAL CML, CMML AND MDS/MPN-U. 2015 6 959 44 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA AND ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA: NOVEL PATHOGENETIC LESIONS. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) AND ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA (ACML) ARE DISTINCT, YET RELATED, ENTITIES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MDS/MPN) CHARACTERIZED BY MORPHOLOGIC DYSPLASIA WITH ACCUMULATION OF MONOCYTES OR NEUTROPHILS, RESPECTIVELY. OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF CMML AND ACML HAS ADVANCED, MAINLY DUE TO THE APPLICATION OF NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES SUCH AS ARRAY-BASED KARYOTYPING AND NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING. IN ADDITION TO PREVIOUSLY KNOWN RECURRENT ABERRATIONS, SOMATIC UNIPARENTAL DISOMY AFFECTING CHROMOSOMES 3, 4, 7, AND 11 FREQUENTLY OCCURS IN CMML. NOVEL SOMATIC MUTATIONS OF GENES, INCLUDING THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH PROLIFERATION SIGNALING (CBL, RAS, RUNX1, JAK2 (V617F)) AND WITH MODIFICATION OF EPIGENETIC STATUS (TET2, ASXL1, UTX, EZH2) HAVE BEEN FOUND. VARIOUS COMBINATIONS OF MUTATIONS SUGGEST A MULTISTEP PATHOGENESIS AND MAY ACCOUNT FOR CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY. MOST RECENTLY, SEVERAL SPLICEOSOME-ASSOCIATED-GENE MUTATIONS WERE REPORTED AND SRSF2 MUTATIONS ARE FREQUENTLY DETECTED IN CMML. THE PROGNOSTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE MOLECULAR LESIONS, IN PARTICULAR THEIR VALUE AS BIOMARKERS OF RESPONSE OR RESISTANCE TO SPECIFIC THERAPIES, WHILE UNCERTAIN NOW IS LIKELY TO BE CLARIFIED AS LARGE SYSTEMATIC STUDIES COME TO COMPLETION. 2012 7 3872 60 JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA-A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW AND RECENT ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT. JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (JMML) IS A RARE PEDIATRIC MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM OVERLAP DISEASE. JMML IS ASSOCIATED WITH MUTATIONS IN THE RAS PATHWAY GENES RESULTING IN THE MYELOID PROGENITORS BEING SENSITIVE TO GRANULOCYTE MONOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR (GM-CSF). KARYOTYPE ABNORMALITIES AND ADDITIONAL EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS CAN ALSO BE FOUND IN JMML. NEUROFIBROMATOSIS AND NOONAN'S SYNDROME HAVE A PREDISPOSITION FOR JMML. IN A FEW PATIENTS, THE RAS GENES (NRAS, KRAS, AND PTPN11) ARE MUTATED AT THE GERMLINE AND THIS USUALLY RESULTS IN A TRANSIENT MYELOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDER WITH A GOOD PROGNOSIS. JMML WITH SOMATIC RAS MUTATION BEHAVES AGGRESSIVELY. JMML PRESENTS WITH CYTOPENIAS AND LEUKEMIC INFILTRATION INTO ORGANS. THE LABORATORY FINDINGS INCLUDE HYPERLEUKOCYTOSIS, MONOCYTOSIS, INCREASED HEMOGLOBIN-F LEVELS, AND CIRCULATING MYELOID PRECURSORS. THE BLAST CELLS IN THE PERIPHERAL BLOOD/BONE-MARROW ASPIRATE ARE LESS THAN 20% AND THE ABSENCE OF THE BCR-ABL TRANSLOCATION HELPS TO DIFFERENTIATE FROM CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA. JMML SHOULD BE DIFFERENTIATED FROM IMMUNODEFICIENCIES, VIRAL INFECTIONS, INTRAUTERINE INFECTIONS, HEMOPHAGOLYMPHOHISTIOCYTOSIS, OTHER MYELOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS, AND LEUKEMIAS. CHEMOTHERAPY IS EMPLOYED AS A BRIDGE TO HSCT, EXCEPT IN FEW WITH LESS AGGRESSIVE DISEASE, IN WHICH CHEMOTHERAPY ALONE CAN RESULT IN LONG TERM REMISSION. AZACITIDINE HAS SHOWN PROMISE AS A SINGLE AGENT TO STABILIZE THE DISEASE. THE PROGNOSIS OF JMML IS POOR WITH ABOUT 50% OF PATIENTS SURVIVING AFTER AN ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT (HSCT). ALLOGENEIC HSCT IS THE ONLY KNOWN CURE FOR JMML TO DATE. MYELOABLATIVE CONDITIONING IS MOST COMMONLY USED WITH GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE (GVHD) PROPHYLAXIS TAILORED TO THE AGGRESSIVENESS OF THE DISEASE. RELAPSES ARE COMMON EVEN AFTER HSCT AND A SECOND HSCT CAN SALVAGE A THIRD OF THESE PATIENTS. NOVEL OPTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF JMML E.G., HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS, MEK INHIBITORS, JAK INHIBITORS, TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS, ETC. ARE BEING EXPLORED. 2021 8 957 40 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA: A CONCISE CLINICAL AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEW. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL DISORDER WITH MYELODYSPLASTIC AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE OVERLAP FEATURES, AND AN INHERENT TENDENCY TO TRANSFORM TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA. APPROXIMATELY 30% OF PATIENTS PRESENT WITH CLONAL CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES, WHILE ALMOST 90% HAVE MOLECULAR ABERRATIONS INVOLVING EPIGENETIC REGULATION, THE SPLICEOSOME COMPONENT MACHINERY, TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR GENES AND TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS/REGULATORS. NUMEROUS PROGNOSTIC MODELS EXIST FOR CMML, WITH MORE RECENT MODELS INCORPORATING PROGNOSTIC MUTATIONS, SUCH AS THOSE INVOLVING ASXL1. OTHER VARIABLES THAT SEEM TO CONSISTENTLY AFFECT OUTCOMES INCLUDE THE DEGREE OF LEUCOCYTOSIS/MONOCYTOSIS, ANAEMIA AND THROMBOCYTOPENIA. ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT REMAINS THE ONLY CURATIVE OPTION FOR CMML, WHILE HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS CAN BE USED FOR TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE PATIENTS OR THOSE WITHOUT SUITABLE STEM CELL SOURCES. TARGETING BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS ACTIVATED IN CMML OFFERS POTENTIAL HOPE FOR MORE EFFECTIVE AND LESS TOXIC THERAPIES. 2014 9 1266 54 CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL STEM CELL DISORDER ASSOCIATED WITH PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS AND AN INHERENT TENDENCY TO TRANSFORM TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA. CMML HAS OVERLAPPING FEATURES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS. CLONAL CYTOGENETIC CHANGES ARE SEEN IN ~30%, WHEREAS GENE MUTATIONS ARE SEEN IN >90% OF PATIENTS. COMMON CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES INCLUDE; TRISOMY 8, -Y, -7/DEL(7Q), TRISOMY 21 AND DEL(20Q), WITH THE MAYO-FRENCH RISK STRATIFICATION EFFECTIVELY RISK STRATIFYING PATIENTS BASED ON CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES. GENE MUTATIONS FREQUENTLY INVOLVE EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (TET2 ~60%), MODULATORS OF CHROMATIN (ASXL1 ~40%), SPLICEOSOME COMPONENTS (SRSF2 ~50%), TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS (RUNX1 ~15%) AND SIGNAL PATHWAYS (RAS ~30%, CBL ~15%). OF THESE, THUS FAR, ONLY NONSENSE AND FRAMESHIFT ASXL1 MUTATIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO NEGATIVELY IMPACT OVERALL SURVIVAL. THIS HAS RESULTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY, MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED (INCLUSIVE OF ASXL1 MUTATIONS) CMML PROGNOSTIC MODELS, INCLUDING MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL AND THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES MODEL. BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE PREVALENT GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC DYSREGULATION HAS RESULTED IN EMERGING TARGETED TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR SOME PATIENTS. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED (CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR) PROGNOSTIC MODEL ALONG WITH CMML-SPECIFIC RESPONSE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ARE MUCH NEEDED FUTURE GOALS. 2016 10 2277 39 EPIGENETIC REGULATION BY ASXL1 IN MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. MYELOID MALIGNANCIES ARE CLONAL HEMATOPOIETIC DISORDERS THAT ARE COMPRISED OF A SPECTRUM OF GENETICALLY HETEROGENEOUS DISORDERS, INCLUDING MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS), MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPN), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), AND ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML). MYELOID MALIGNANCIES ARE CHARACTERIZED BY EXCESSIVE PROLIFERATION, ABNORMAL SELF-RENEWAL, AND/OR DIFFERENTIATION DEFECTS OF HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS (HSCS) AND MYELOID PROGENITOR CELLS HEMATOPOIETIC STEM/PROGENITOR CELLS (HSPCS). MYELOID MALIGNANCIES CAN BE CAUSED BY GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS THAT PROVOKE KEY CELLULAR FUNCTIONS, SUCH AS SELF-RENEWAL, PROLIFERATION, BIASED LINEAGE COMMITMENT, AND DIFFERENTIATION. ADVANCES IN NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING LED TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE MUTATIONS IN MYELOID NEOPLASMS, AND MANY NEW GENE MUTATIONS WERE IDENTIFIED AS KEY FACTORS IN DRIVING THE PATHOGENESIS OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. THE POLYCOMB PROTEIN ASXL1 WAS IDENTIFIED TO BE FREQUENTLY MUTATED IN ALL FORMS OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES, WITH MUTATIONAL FREQUENCIES OF 20%, 43%, 10%, AND 20% IN MDS, CMML, MPN, AND AML, RESPECTIVELY. SIGNIFICANTLY, ASXL1 MUTATIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH A POOR PROGNOSIS IN ALL FORMS OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. THE FACT THAT ASXL1 MUTATIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CMML, MDS, AND AML, POINTS TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT ASXL1 MUTATION IS A KEY FACTOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES. THIS REVIEW SUMMARIZES THE RECENT ADVANCES IN UNDERSTANDING MYELOID MALIGNANCIES WITH A SPECIFIC FOCUS ON ASXL1 MUTATIONS. 2023 11 1311 61 DEFINITIONS, BIOLOGY, AND CURRENT THERAPEUTIC LANDSCAPE OF MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS. MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MDS/MPN) ARE HEMATOLOGICAL DISORDERS CHARACTERIZED BY BOTH PROLIFERATIVE AND DYSPLASTIC FEATURES. ACCORDING TO THE 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS CLASSIFICATION (ICC), MDS/MPN CONSISTS OF CLONAL MONOCYTOSIS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE (CMUS), CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML), ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA (ACML), MDS/MPN WITH SF3B1 MUTATION (MDS/MPN-T-SF3B1), MDS/MPN WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS AND THROMBOCYTOSIS NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (MDS/MPN-RS-T-NOS), AND MDS/MPN-NOS. THESE DISORDERS EXHIBIT A DIVERSE RANGE OF GENETIC ALTERATIONS INVOLVING VARIOUS TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS (E.G., RUNX1), SIGNALING MOLECULES (E.G., NRAS, JAK2), SPLICING FACTORS (E.G., SF3B, SRSF2), AND EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (E.G., TET2, ASXL1, DNMT3A), AS WELL AS SPECIFIC CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES (E.G., 8 TRISOMIES, 7 DELETIONS/MONOSOMIES). CLINICAL STUDIES EXPLORING THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS FOR HIGHER-RISK MDS/MPN OVERLAP SYNDROMES MOSTLY INVOLVE HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS, BUT OTHER TREATMENTS SUCH AS LENALIDOMIDE AND TARGETED AGENTS SUCH AS JAK INHIBITORS AND INHIBITORS TARGETING PARP, HISTONE DEACETYLASES, AND THE RAS PATHWAY ARE UNDER INVESTIGATION. WHILE THESE TREATMENT MODALITIES CAN PROVIDE PARTIAL DISEASE CONTROL, ALLOGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION (ALLO-BMT) IS THE ONLY POTENTIALLY CURATIVE OPTION FOR PATIENTS. IMPORTANT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS CORRELATING WITH OUTCOMES AFTER ALLO-BMT INCLUDE COMORBIDITIES, SPLENOMEGALY, KARYOTYPE ALTERATIONS, AND THE BONE MARROW BLASTS PERCENTAGE AT THE TIME OF TRANSPLANTATION. FUTURE RESEARCH IS IMPERATIVE TO OPTIMIZING THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES AND ENHANCING PATIENT OUTCOMES IN MDS/MPN NEOPLASMS. IN THIS REVIEW, WE SUMMARIZE MDS/MPN DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA, BIOLOGY, AND CURRENT AND FUTURE TREATMENT OPTIONS, INCLUDING BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION. 2023 12 4442 39 MOLECULAR GENETICS OF MDS/MPN OVERLAP SYNDROMES. THE MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MDS/MPN) ARE A HETEROGENOUS GROUP OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES HALLMARKED BY CLINICOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES THAT OVERLAP WITH MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS. FORMALLY RECOGNIZED BY THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, THIS GROUP INCLUDES THE ENTITIES CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA, JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA, ATYPICAL CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA, MDS/MPN WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS AND THROMBOCYTOSIS AND MDS/MPN, UNCLASSIFIABLE. ADVANCEMENTS IN NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING HAVE BEGUN TO UNRAVEL THE MOLECULAR UNDERPINNINGS OF THESE DISEASES, IDENTIFYING AN ARRAY OF RECURRENTLY MUTATED GENES INVOLVED IN EPIGENETIC REGULATION, RNA SPLICING, TRANSCRIPTION, AND CELL SIGNALING. DESPITE MOLECULAR OVERLAP WITH OTHER MYELOID MALIGNANCIES, EACH ENTITY DISPLAYS A UNIQUE SPECTRUM OF SOMATIC MUTATIONS SUPPORTING THEIR UNIQUE PATHOBIOLOGY AND CLINICAL FEATURES. IMPORTANTLY, MOLECULAR PROFILING IS BECOMING AN INTEGRAL TOOL UTILIZED IN ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE. THIS REVIEW SUMMARIZES OUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF THE MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF OVERLAP SYNDROMES AND DETAILS THE IMPACT OF SOMATIC MUTATIONS IN DIAGNOSTIC, PROGNOSTIC, AND THERAPEUTIC DECISION-MAKING. 2020 13 2956 43 GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC FACTORS INTERACTING WITH CLONAL HEMATOPOIESIS RESULTING IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: SINCE 2016, THE WHO HAS RECOGNIZED THE SIGNIFICANT PHENOTYPIC HETEROGENEITY OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) AS A MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM (MDS/MPN) OVERLAP DISEASE. ALTHOUGH SHARING MANY SOMATIC MUTATIONS WITH MDS AND MPN, THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW IS TO PUT RECENT BIOLOGICAL FINDINGS OF CMML IN THE CONTEXT OF EVOLUTIONARY THEORY, HIGHLIGHTING IT AS A DISTINCT EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORY OCCURRING IN THE CONTEXT OF CLONAL HEMATOPOIESIS. RECENT FINDINGS: CLONAL HEMATOPOIESIS OF INDETERMINATE POTENTIAL (CHIP), WITH A MUTATIONAL SPECTRUM AND PREVALENCE CORRELATED WITH AGE, HAS BEEN DEFINED. ENRICHED IN DNMT3A, TET2, AND ASXL1 MUTATIONS, CLONAL EVOLUTION CAN PROGRESS INTO VARIOUS EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES INCLUDING CMML. IMPACT OF FOUNDER MUTATIONS (PRIMARILY TET2) ON INCREASED HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL FITNESS HAS BEEN WELL CHARACTERIZED. EPISTATIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MUTATIONS AND EPIGENETIC EVENTS HAVE BEEN EXPLORED, BOTH IN CMML AND ITS PEDIATRIC COUNTERPART JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA, INCLUDING CMML TRANSFORMATION TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA. TOGETHER, THESE FINDINGS HAVE CONTRIBUTED SIGNIFICANTLY TOWARD CMML EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS. SUMMARY: DESPITE RELATIVELY FEW 'DRIVER' MUTATIONS IN CMML, EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF CHRONIC LEUKEMIA REMAINS INCOMPLETELY UNDERSTOOD. RECENT STUDIES HAVE SHED LIGHT ON THE IMPORTANCE OF STUDYING EPIGENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF MUTATIONS AND EPISTASIS BETWEEN KEY MUTATIONS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND CLONAL ARCHITECTURE AND EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS. 2020 14 4565 34 MYELOID MALIGNANCIES: MUTATIONS, MODELS AND MANAGEMENT. MYELOID MALIGNANT DISEASES COMPRISE CHRONIC (INCLUDING MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES, MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS AND CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA) AND ACUTE (ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA) STAGES. THEY ARE CLONAL DISEASES ARISING IN HEMATOPOIETIC STEM OR PROGENITOR CELLS. MUTATIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE DISEASES OCCUR IN SEVERAL GENES WHOSE ENCODED PROTEINS BELONG PRINCIPALLY TO FIVE CLASSES: SIGNALING PATHWAYS PROTEINS (E.G. CBL, FLT3, JAK2, RAS), TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS (E.G. CEBPA, ETV6, RUNX1), EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (E.G. ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, SUZ12, TET2, UTX), TUMOR SUPPRESSORS (E.G. TP53), AND COMPONENTS OF THE SPLICEOSOME (E.G. SF3B1, SRSF2). LARGE-SCALE SEQUENCING EFFORTS WILL SOON LEAD TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE REPERTOIRE OF THESE MUTATIONS, ALLOWING FOR A BETTER DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION OF MYELOID MALIGNANCIES, THE IDENTIFICATION OF NEW PROGNOSTIC MARKERS AND THERAPEUTIC TARGETS, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL THERAPIES. GIVEN THE IMPORTANCE OF EPIGENETIC DEREGULATION IN MYELOID DISEASES, THE USE OF DRUGS TARGETING EPIGENETIC REGULATORS APPEARS AS A MOST PROMISING THERAPEUTIC APPROACH. 2012 15 6574 40 TREATMENT OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA WITH 5-AZACYTIDINE: CASE REPORTS. EPIGENETIC THERAPY WITH HYPOMETHYLATING AGENT (5-AZACYTIDINE; AZA) IS COMMON IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC SUBTYPES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME (MDS), BUT THERE ARE ONLY FEW STUDIES IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) PATIENTS. IN THIS PAPER OUR EXPERIENCE WITH 3 CMML PATIENTS TREATED WITH AZA IS DESCRIBED. IN ONE PATIENT TRANSFUSION INDEPENDENCY WAS OBSERVED AFTER 4 TREATMENT CYCLES; IN ONE CASE A PARTIAL RESPONSE WAS RECORDED, BUT A PROGRESSION TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML) AFTER 13 AZA CYCLES HAS APPEARED. IN ONE PATIENT, AZA IN REDUCED DOSAGE WAS ADMINISTERED AS A BRIDGING TREATMENT BEFORE ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION (ASCT), BUT IN THE CONTROL BONE MARROW ASPIRATE (BEFORE ASCT) A PROGRESSION TO AML WAS RECORDED. FUTURE STUDIES ARE MANDATORY FOR EVALUATION OF NEW MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL FEATURES WHICH COULD PREDICT THE EFFICIENCY OF HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS IN CMML THERAPY WITH RESPECT TO OVERALL SURVIVAL, EVENT-FREE SURVIVAL, QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR, AND PHARMACOECONOMY. 2012 16 4485 36 MOLECULAR SIMILARITY BETWEEN MYELODYSPLASTIC FORM OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA AND REFRACTORY ANEMIA WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA IS SIMILAR TO BUT A SEPARATE ENTITY FROM BOTH MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS AND MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES, AND SHOWS EITHER MYELOPROLIFERATIVE OR MYELODYSPLASTIC FEATURES. WE ASK WHETHER THIS DISTINCTION MAY HAVE A MOLECULAR BASIS. WE ESTABLISHED THE GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES OF 39 SAMPLES OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (INCLUDING 12 CD34-POSITIVE) AND 32 CD34-POSITIVE SAMPLES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES BY USING AFFYMETRIX MICROARRAYS, AND STUDIED THE STATUS OF 18 GENES BY SANGER SEQUENCING AND ARRAY-COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION IN 53 SAMPLES. ANALYSIS OF 12 MRNAS FROM CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA ESTABLISHED A GENE EXPRESSION SIGNATURE OF 122 PROBE SETS DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED BETWEEN PROLIFERATIVE AND DYSPLASTIC CASES OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. AS COMPARED TO PROLIFERATIVE CASES, DYSPLASTIC CASES OVER-EXPRESSED GENES INVOLVED IN RED BLOOD CELL BIOLOGY. WHEN APPLIED TO 32 MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES, THIS GENE EXPRESSION SIGNATURE WAS ABLE TO DISCRIMINATE REFRACTORY ANEMIAS WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS FROM REFRACTORY ANEMIAS WITH EXCESS OF BLASTS. BY COMPARING MRNAS FROM THESE TWO FORMS OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES WE DERIVED A SECOND GENE EXPRESSION SIGNATURE. THIS SIGNATURE SEPARATED THE MYELODYSPLASTIC AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE FORMS OF CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS. THESE RESULTS WERE VALIDATED USING TWO INDEPENDENT GENE EXPRESSION DATA SETS. WE FOUND THAT MYELODYSPLASTIC CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS ARE CHARACTERIZED BY MUTATIONS IN TRANSCRIPTION/EPIGENETIC REGULATORS (ASXL1, RUNX1, TET2) AND SPLICING GENES (SRSF2) AND THE ABSENCE OF MUTATIONS IN SIGNALING GENES. MYELODYSPLASTIC CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIAS AND REFRACTORY ANEMIAS WITH RING SIDEROBLASTS SHARE A COMMON EXPRESSION PROGRAM SUGGESTING THEY ARE PART OF A CONTINUUM, WHICH IS NOT TOTALLY EXPLAINED BY THEIR SIMILAR BUT NOT, HOWEVER, IDENTICAL MUTATION SPECTRUM. 2013 17 3871 51 JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA - A BONA FIDE RASOPATHY SYNDROME. JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (JMML) IS A PEDIATRIC MYELODYSPLASTIC/MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM OVERLAP SYNDROME WITH SUSTAINED PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS, AGGRESSIVE FEATURES, AND POOR OUTCOMES. IN >90% OF CASES JMML IS DRIVEN BY GERMLINE OR SOMATIC MUTATIONS INVOLVING THE CANONICAL RAS PATHWAY (PTPN11, NRAS, CBL, KRAS AND NF1), WITH SOMATIC MUTATIONS/ALTERATIONS IN RAS PATHWAY GENES (SECOND HIT), SETBP1, ASXL1 AND JAK3 RESULTING IN DISEASE PROGRESSION. WHILE SPONTANEOUS REGRESSION HAS BEEN SEEN IN GERMLINE PTPN11 AND CBL MUTANT JMML, IN MOST PATIENTS, ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT IS THE ONLY CURATIVE MODALITY. JMML SHARES SEVERAL PHENOTYPIC FEATURES WITH ITS ADULT COUNTERPART PROLIFERATIVE, CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (PCMML). PCMML LARGELY OCCURS DUE TO RAS PATHWAY MUTATIONS THAT OCCUR IN THE CONTEXT OF AGE RELATED CLONAL HEMATOPOIESIS (TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1), WHILE JMML IS A BONA FIDE RASOPATHY, WITH ADDITIONAL SOMATIC MUTATIONS, INCLUDING IN EPIGENETIC REGULATORS GENES RESULTING IN DISEASE PROGRESSION. 2020 18 960 76 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: 2016 UPDATE ON DIAGNOSIS, RISK STRATIFICATION, AND MANAGEMENT. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL DISORDER CHARACTERIZED BY OVERLAPPING FEATURES OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS. DIAGNOSIS IS BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF PERSISTENT (>3 MONTHS) PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTOSIS (>1 X 10(9) /L), ALONG WITH BONE MARROW DYSPLASIA. CLONAL CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES OCCUR IN APPROXIMATELY 20-30% OF PATIENTS, WHILE >90% HAVE GENE MUTATIONS. MUTATIONS INVOLVING TET2 ( APPROXIMATELY 60%), SRSF2 ( APPROXIMATELY 50%), ASXL1 ( APPROXIMATELY 40%), AND RAS ( APPROXIMATELY 30%) ARE FREQUENT; WITH ONLY ASXL1 MUTATIONS NEGATIVELY IMPACTING OVERALL SURVIVAL. TWO MOLECULARLY INTEGRATED, CMML-SPECIFIC PROGNOSTIC MODELS INCLUDE; THE GROUPE FRANCAIS DES MYELODYSPLASIES (GFM) AND THE MOLECULAR MAYO MODEL (MMM). THE GFM MODEL SEGREGATES PATIENTS INTO 3 GROUPS BASED ON: AGE >65 YEARS, WBC >15 X 10(9) /L, ANEMIA, PLATELETS <100 X 10(9) /L, AND ASXL1 MUTATION STATUS, WITH RESPECTIVE MEDIAN SURVIVALS OF 56 (LOW), 27.4 (INTERMEDIATE), AND 9.2 (HIGH) MONTHS. THE MMM IS BASED ON ASXL1 MUTATIONAL STATUS, ABSOLUTE MONOCYTE COUNT >10 X 10(9) /L, HEMOGLOBIN <10 G/DL, PLATELETS <100 X 109/L AND CIRCULATING IMMATURE MYELOID CELLS. THIS MODEL STRATIFIES PATIENTS INTO FOUR GROUPS; HIGH (>/=3 RISK FACTORS), INTERMEDIATE-2 (2 RISK FACTORS), INTERMEDIATE-1 (1 RISK FACTOR) AND LOW (NO RISK FACTORS), WITH MEDIAN SURVIVALS OF 16, 31, 59, AND 97 MONTHS, RESPECTIVELY. HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS SUCH AS 5-AZACITIDINE AND DECITABINE ARE COMMONLY USED, WITH OVERALL RESPONSE RATES OF APPROXIMATELY 30-40% AND COMPLETE REMISSION RATES OF APPROXIMATELY 7-17%. ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT IS THE ONLY POTENTIALLY CURATIVE OPTION, BUT IS ASSOCIATED WITH SIGNIFICANT MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY. INDIVIDUALIZED THERAPY, INCLUDING EPIGENETIC MODIFIERS AND SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITORS, ARE EXCITING PROSPECTS. AM. J. HEMATOL. 91:632-642, 2016. (C) 2016 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC. 2016 19 958 56 CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA - A REVIEW. INTRODUCTION: CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL MYELOID NEOPLASM, DENOTED BY OVERLAPPING MYELODYSPLASTIC AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE FEATURES, WITH POOR OVERALL SURVIVAL AND HIGH TRANSFORMATION RATE TO ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA. AREAS COVERED: THIS REVIEW, FOLLOWING A THOROUGH MEDLINE SEARCH OF PERTINENT PUBLISHED LITERATURE, DISCUSSES THE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA, THE PATHOGENESIS, AND THE COMPLEX GENETIC LANDSCAPE OF THE DISEASE. PROGNOSTICATION, RESPONSE CRITERIA, THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS, EFFICACY OF ESTABLISHED AND NOVEL TREATMENT MODALITIES ARE THOROUGHLY REVIEWED. EXPERT OPINION: CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES AND MUTATIONS IN GENES INVOLVED IN EPIGENETIC AND TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION, AND CELL-SIGNALING ARE ABUNDANT IN CMML AND IMPLICATED IN ITS COMPLEX PATHOGENESIS. AS PRESENCE OF THESE MUTATIONS CARRY A PROGNOSTIC IMPACT, THEY ARE INCREASINGLY INCORPORATED IN RISK-STRATIFICATION SCHEMES. NOVEL RESPONSE CRITERIA HAVE BEEN PROPOSED, CONSIDERING THE UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE DISEASE. ALTHOUGH ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION REMAINS THE ONLY TREATMENT WITH CURATIVE INTENT, IT IS RESERVED FOR A MINORITY OF PATIENTS; THEREFORE, THERE IS AN UNMET NEED FOR OPTIMIZING TREATMENT MODALITIES, SUCH AS HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS, AND INTRODUCING NOVEL AGENTS, WHICH COULD SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVE SURVIVAL AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF CMML PATIENTS. CLINICAL TRIALS DEDICATED SPECIFICALLY TO CMML ARE NEEDED TO EXPLORE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NOVEL TREATMENT MODALITIES. 2021 20 5284 43 PROPOSALS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS IN CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA. CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML) IS A CLONAL HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY OF MOSTLY OLDER INDIVIDUALS THAT EXHIBITS BOTH MYELODYSPLASTIC AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE FEATURES. CMML PRESENTATION AND OUTCOME ARE VARIABLE, REFLECTING GENETIC AND CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY. HYPOMETHYLATING AGENTS ARE THE MAINSTAY OF THERAPY BUT INDUCE COMPLETE REMISSIONS IN LESS THAN 20% OF PATIENTS AND DO NOT PROLONG SURVIVAL COMPARED TO HYDROXYUREA. ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT (ASCT) IS POTENTIALLY CURATIVE, BUT FEW PATIENTS QUALIFY DUE TO ADVANCED AGE AND/OR COMORBIDITIES. WORK OF THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS HAS IDENTIFIED KEY MOLECULAR PATHWAYS THAT DRIVE DISEASE PROLIFERATION AND TRANSFORMATION TO ACUTE LEUKEMIA, INCLUDING JAK/STAT AND MAPK SIGNALING AND EPIGENETIC DYSREGULATION. THERE IS INCREASINGLY COMPELLING EVIDENCE THAT INFLAMMATION IS A MAJOR DRIVER OF CMML PROGRESSION. THUS FAR HOWEVER, THIS MECHANISTIC KNOWLEDGE HAS NOT YET BEEN TRANSLATED INTO IMPROVED OUTCOMES, SUGGESTING THAT FUNDAMENTALLY NEW APPROACHES ARE REQUIRED. IN THIS REVIEW, WE DISCUSS THE DISEASE COURSE, NEW CLASSIFICATIONS, AND CURRENT TREATMENT LANDSCAPE OF CMML. WE REVIEW ONGOING CLINICAL STUDIES AND DISCUSS OPTIONS FOR RATIONALLY BASED FUTURE CLINICAL TRIALS. 2023